Liquid Chlorophyll

A larger chlorophyllin amount offers more of the main active than the original. The serving also carries substantial carbohydrate and calories, so the added chlorophyll comes with a meaningful nutritional trade-off.

The same chlorophyllin amount is paired with very little sodium and a separate copper declaration. It costs more per serving and still uses a chlorophyll derivative, but the mineral disclosure is more complete.

Clear chlorophyllin, copper, and sodium declarations make the liquid easy to evaluate, and the chlorophyll-focused analysis is stronger than the original. The active amount is lower, so it favors label clarity rather than potency.

The same sodium copper chlorophyllin form is supplied at a much lower serving cost. Its amount is half that of the original, so matching the original intake would reduce the apparent savings.

Sodium copper chlorophyllin and a small trace-mineral complex come at a lower serving cost. The chlorophyllin amount is half the original, and the trace-mineral blend is not individually detailed.

The clearly named chlorophyllin form comes with very little sodium and a lower serving cost. Its chlorophyllin amount is lower, while the separate copper declaration may matter to people monitoring copper intake.

Clearly identified chlorophyllin with separate copper and sodium amounts comes at a low serving cost. The active amount is half the original, but the concentrated format still offers reasonable value for a smaller dose.

The chlorophyll amount matches the original and sodium is minimal, offering a close liquid alternative. Its exact chlorophyll form is not given and the serving cost is somewhat higher, which limits the value advantage.

The simple liquid provides clearly named sodium copper chlorophyllin without unrelated actives. Its amount is lower and the serving cost is higher, so the value rests mainly on formula simplicity rather than quantity.