Product Image

Hyaluronic Acid 100 mg With Co-Factors

Protocol For Life Balance
4.7
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
(113 ratings)
Proline 100 mg
Product Image
Score66
A sensible ingredient combination is overshadowed by modest proline depth and poor value compared with similar formulas.
How scoring works
Quantity:60 Capsule(s) • (60 servings)
Goals:

Score 66

A sensible ingredient combination is overshadowed by modest proline depth and poor value compared with similar formulas.
How scoring works
$32.00($0.53 per serving)
iHerb
$ 32.00
Pure Formulas
$ 32.00
Vitacost
$ 32.00
Report prices

Analysis

A 100 mg L-proline amount sits alongside hyaluronic acid, alpha-lipoic acid, and grape-seed extract. The combination is logically arranged for broad structural and antioxidant support.

Proline contributes only a modest amount and is not the formula's dominant active. The supplied ingredient information also offers no special sourcing or quality distinction over similar formulas.

The high serving cost is difficult to justify because equivalent active amounts appear in less expensive products. It is best suited to users who specifically prefer this formulation and do not prioritize proline-focused value.

Who is it for
  • Users wanting a combined hyaluronic-acid formula
  • People who prioritize this specific capsule blend
Best for
  • Broad structural-support routines

Pros

  • Clearly disclosed free-form L-proline
  • Includes hyaluronic acid
  • Adds two antioxidant cofactors
  • Simple capsule delivery

Cons

  • Only 100 mg of L-proline
  • High serving cost
  • No clear quality advantage
  • Weak proline-specific value

Nutrient quality

78 High impact

The formula uses identifiable ingredient forms, but only hyaluronic acid has a clearly substantial amount. Proline and the antioxidant cofactors are modest, creating breadth without much depth or dosing excess.

Ingredient transparency

83 Highest impact

The shown active ingredients have clear amounts and no proprietary blend hides a key dose. Daily directions and a complete inactive-ingredient list are not supplied.

Customer satisfaction

66 High impact

The supplied aggregate rating is favorable and supported by a moderate review volume. Detailed feedback is unavailable, so repeated complaints and fit with the intended use cannot be judged.

Value for money

28 Situational impact

The formula provides weak practical value for the targeted active amount. Complementary ingredients add breadth but reduce targeted value.

Report analysis

Ingredients

IngredientAmount per serving
Sodium (Sodium Hyaluronate)
 10 mg
Hyaluronic Acid (Sodium Hyaluronate)
 100 mg
L-Proline
100 mg
Alpha Lipoic Acid
50 mg
Grape seed extract (Polyphenols)
 25 mg
Gluten Free Adults 18–50 Vegan Dairy Free Vegetarian
Report overview
Proline · 100 mg OverallScore68
A+ Active Ingredient Quality & BioavailabilityC+ Dose, Safety & Label TransparencyF Value

Free-form L-Proline is clearly disclosed, though the 100 mg serving remains modest for targeted structural support. The vegetable capsule provides a simple delivery format with several complementary ingredients. Proline-focused value is poor because the serving cost is high relative to the amount supplied.

View ingredientView products
Loading alternative details
88 Performance

L-Proline 500 mg

Swanson Premium Brand
<p>Its label clearly provides 500 mg of L-Proline, making it a more clearly defined proline option. Compared with the original, its ingredient and goal alignment is stronger, although the input does not provide independent testing or absorption evidence.</p>
73 Performance

Ortho C+ Lemon Flavor

AOR Advanced Orthomolecular Research Premium
<p>Its label clearly provides 3000 mg of Vitamin C as Ascorbic Acid, making it a more clearly defined proline option. Compared with the original, its ingredient and goal alignment is stronger, although the input does not provide independent testing or absorption evidence.</p>
73 Performance

Liga-Tend

Country Life
<p>Its label clearly provides 75 mg of Vitamin C as Ascorbic Acid, making it a more clearly defined proline option. Compared with the original, its ingredient and goal alignment is stronger, although the input does not provide independent testing or absorption evidence.</p>
88 Budget

L-Proline 2000 mg

Nutricost
<p>Its label clearly provides 2000 mg of L-Proline, preserving relevant proline coverage. Compared with the original, it lowers the serving cost, although the input does not provide independent testing or absorption evidence.</p>
81 Budget

Hyaluronic Acid Complex

California Gold Nutrition
<p>Its label clearly provides 100 mg of Hyaluronic Acid as Sodium Hyaluronate, preserving relevant proline coverage. Compared with the original, it lowers the serving cost, although the input does not provide independent testing or absorption evidence.</p>
79 Budget

Beauty Blossom Complex

Solumeve
<p>Its label clearly provides 100 mg of Hyaluronic Acid as Sodium Hyaluronate, preserving relevant proline coverage. Compared with the original, it lowers the serving cost, although the input does not provide independent testing or absorption evidence.</p>
75 Value

Double Strength Hyaluronic Acid 100 mg

NOW
<p>Its label clearly provides 100 mg of Hyaluronic Acid as Sodium Hyaluronate, keeping the formula relevant to proline. Compared with the original, the lower serving cost and ingredient detail create a useful quality-to-cost balance, although the input does not provide independent testing or absorption evidence.</p>
84 Value

Pro-Rite

Carlson
<p>Its label clearly provides 500 mg of L-Lysine as Lysine Monohydrochloride, keeping the formula relevant to proline. Compared with the original, the lower serving cost and ingredient detail create a useful quality-to-cost balance, although the input does not provide independent testing or absorption evidence.</p>
82 Value

Skin Nails & Hair

Solgar
<p>Its label clearly provides 120 mg of Vitamin C as L-Ascorbic Acid, keeping the formula relevant to proline. Compared with the original, the lower serving cost and ingredient detail create a useful quality-to-cost balance, although the input does not provide independent testing or absorption evidence.</p>
Report alternatives