Product Image

Glutamine 300

PS ProSupps
4.6
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
(629 ratings)
Glutamine 4500 mg
Product Image
Score84
A practical 4.5 g powder serving with excellent cost efficiency, balanced by limited detail about purity grade and processing.
How scoring works
Quantity:10 Ounce(s) • (66 servings)
Goals:
Immunity

Score 84

A practical 4.5 g powder serving with excellent cost efficiency, balanced by limited detail about purity grade and processing.
How scoring works
$11.76($0.17 per serving)
iHerb
$ 11.76
BodyBuilding.com
$ 21.99
Supplement City
$ 21.99
Report prices

Analysis

One teaspoon provides 4.5 g of L-glutamine, close to a commonly used 5 g serving. The powder format delivers that amount without a large capsule burden and allows smaller portions when desired.

The single active ingredient and serving amount are clearly disclosed. No premium purity grade or micronized processing is stated, so mixing characteristics and source quality are not well differentiated.

The large amount per container provides particularly favorable cost efficiency. It suits regular higher-intake use, especially for people comfortable measuring and mixing powder.

Who is it for
  • People seeking a near-5 g serving
  • People comfortable using powder
Best for
  • Regular multi-gram intake
  • Value-focused glutamine routines

Pros

  • 4.5 g in one measured serving
  • No capsule burden
  • Favorable amount per container

Cons

  • No premium purity grade is stated
  • Micronized processing is not claimed
  • Requires measuring and mixing

Nutrient quality

91 Highest impact

The L-isomer is clear, but no premium purity or micronized-processing claim is provided; the powder supplies a substantial amount in one practical serving. The disclosed glutamine amount is not unnecessarily aggressive; glutamine has a plausible immunity-support role but does not provide broad immune coverage; the single-active formula contains no filler ingredients.

.

Ingredient transparency

77 High impact

Every listed active has a specific amount; no proprietary blend hides key doses. L-glutamine is plainly identified, while purity grade and processing details are absent; serving directions and inactive ingredients are not supplied.

.

Customer satisfaction

71 High impact

The supplied aggregate average is favorable, though no individual feedback is available; the large rating sample improves confidence in the aggregate average, but no individual feedback is supplied. Detailed feedback is absent, so repeated complaints cannot be assessed; real-world fit with the intended purpose remains uncertain.

.

Value for money

99 Highest impact

A substantial dose strongly supports the low price; the serving delivers exceptional active value. The single-active formula contains no filler ingredients; the product is highly competitive among glutamine powders.

.
Report analysis

Goals

Immunity
Impact
High effect
C Goal FitB+ Strength of SupportC CoverageA Formula Quality

L-glutamine may support immune-cell fuel needs and gut-barrier integrity during periods of stress. Its connection to everyday immunity is more conditional than that of vitamin C, vitamin D, or zinc.

The 4.5 g powder serving approaches the common 5 g benchmark and is fully disclosed. Lack of a stated purity grade or micronized processing leaves some quality uncertainty.

Study evidence
Glutamine Supportive 36 studies

Ingredients

IngredientAmount per serving
L-Glutamine
4500 mg
Gluten Free Adults 18–50 Women
Report overview
Glutamine · 4500 mg OverallScore82
C Active Ingredient Quality & BioavailabilityA Dose, Safety & Label TransparencyA+ Value

The disclosed 4.5 g serving is close to the commonly used 5 g level and provides a practical amount in one teaspoon. The label clearly identifies L-glutamine, although it does not state a premium purity grade or micronized processing. Its large amount per container also delivers very strong value.

Loading alternative details
Report alternatives

Sources

Published studies used for the product analysis and the top-ranked studies for each ingredient and goal.

  1. Meta-analysis of Glutamine on Immune Function and Post-Operative Complications of Patients With Colorectal Cancer.
    Yang T; Yan X; Cao Y; Bao T; Li G; Gu S; Xiong K; Xiao T · Frontiers in nutrition · 2021
    Meta-analysis2,201 participants31 studies pooledImmunity forGlutamine
  2. Glutamine granule-supplemented enteral nutrition maintains immunological function in severely burned patients.
    Peng X; Yan H; You Z; Wang P; Wang S · Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries · 2006
    Randomized trial48 participantsImmunity forGlutamine
  3. Parenteral glutamine supplementation improves serum albumin values in surgical cancer patients.
    Wu JM; Ho TW; Lai IR; Chen CN; Lin MT · Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2021
    Cohort study1,950 participantsImmunity forGlutamine
  4. Glutamine supplementation and immune function during heavy load training.
    Song QH; Xu RM; Zhang QH; Shen GQ; Ma M; Zhao XP; Guo YH; Wang Y · International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2015
    Randomized trial24 participantsImmunity forGlutamine
  5. Efficacy of Glutamine in Treating Severe Acute Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Dong S; Zhao Z; Li X; Chen Z; Jiang W; Zhou W · Frontiers in nutrition · 2023
    Meta-analysis1,201 participants30 studies pooledImmunity forGlutamine
  6. Decreased mortality and infectious morbidity in adult burn patients given enteral glutamine supplements: a prospective, controlled, randomized clinical trial.
    Garrel D; Patenaude J; Nedelec B; Samson L; Dorais J; Champoux J; D'Elia M; Bernier J · Critical care medicine · 2003
    Randomized trial45 participantsImmunity forGlutamine
  7. Effect of perioperative glutamine-enriched nutritional support on patients with colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Huang Y; Yang XZ; Qin SH; Zhang T; Xie M; Wang JW · World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2026
    Meta-analysis1,643 participants27 studies pooledImmunity forGlutamine
  8. Glutamine administration reduces Gram-negative bacteremia in severely burned patients: a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial versus isonitrogenous control.
    Wischmeyer PE; Lynch J; Liedel J; Wolfson R; Riehm J; Gottlieb L; Kahana M · Critical care medicine · 2001
    Randomized trial26 participantsImmunity forGlutamine