Product Image

L-Glutamine 1000 mg

Solgar
4.7
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
(2002 ratings)
Glutamine 2000 mg
Product Image
Score80
A clearly dosed 2 g tablet serving that makes moderate use practical, though no premium grade is identified and powder is easier at higher intakes.
How scoring works
Quantity:60 Tablet(s) • (30 servings)
Goals:
Immunity

Score 80

A clearly dosed 2 g tablet serving that makes moderate use practical, though no premium grade is identified and powder is easier at higher intakes.
How scoring works
$11.19($0.37 per serving)
iHerb
$ 11.19
Vitacost
$ 11.79
Amazon
$ 13.99
Pure Formulas
$ 11.84
Report prices

Analysis

The labeled serving provides 2 g of L-glutamine from two tablets, a useful middle-range amount. Three tablets would reach 3 g, so moderate intake remains manageable without measuring powder.

The formula clearly discloses standard L-glutamine and avoids a proprietary blend. No premium grade or special processing is stated, and tablets may be less comfortable for people who dislike larger solid doses.

Cost efficiency is reasonable for a clearly dosed tablet product. It works for moderate daily use, while people seeking a full 5 g serving may prefer powder.

Who is it for
  • People who prefer tablets to powder
  • People targeting a moderate glutamine amount
Best for
  • Moderate daily intake
  • Measured tablet-based routines

Pros

  • 2 g supplied in the labeled serving
  • Clear single-ingredient disclosure
  • Moderate intake has a manageable tablet count

Cons

  • No stated premium ingredient grade
  • Higher intake requires several tablets
  • Tablet format may not suit everyone

Nutrient quality

86 Highest impact

The L-isomer is clear, but no premium grade or special processing is stated; the serving is moderate and can reach a stronger intake with a manageable tablet burden. The disclosed glutamine amount is not unnecessarily aggressive; glutamine has a plausible immunity-support role but does not provide broad immune coverage; the single-active formula contains no filler ingredients.

.

Ingredient transparency

76 High impact

Every listed active has a specific amount; no proprietary blend hides key doses. L-glutamine is plain and specific, while purity, sourcing, and processing details are absent; serving directions and inactive ingredients are not supplied.

.

Customer satisfaction

71 High impact

The supplied aggregate average is favorable, though no individual feedback is available; the large rating sample improves confidence in the aggregate average, but no individual feedback is supplied. Detailed feedback is absent, so repeated complaints cannot be assessed; real-world fit with the intended purpose remains uncertain.

.

Value for money

87 Highest impact

A moderate serving supports fair formula value; the cost per active amount is reasonable. The single-active formula contains no filler ingredients; the product is competitive among standard glutamine tablets.

.
Report analysis

Goals

Immunity
Impact
Moderate effect
C- Goal FitC- Strength of SupportD+ CoverageA Formula Quality

Clearly disclosed L-glutamine offers focused support for intestinal cells and may indirectly help barrier function. The simple formula avoids unrelated immune-marketing ingredients.

Its evidence for routine immunity in healthy users is limited, and the serving is modest for targeted gut-barrier use. The tablet format and unspecified ingredient grade provide no special quality advantage.

Study evidence
Glutamine Supportive 36 studies

Ingredients

IngredientAmount per serving
L-Glutamine
2000 mg
Gluten Free Adults 18–50 Vegan Kosher Dairy Free Sugar Free Vegetarian
Report overview
Glutamine · 2000 mg OverallScore73
B- Active Ingredient Quality & BioavailabilityB- Dose, Safety & Label TransparencyB- Value

The clearly disclosed L-glutamine provides a moderate daily amount, but it falls short of the higher intake commonly used for gut barrier support. Reaching 3 g remains practical with three tablets, though the tablet format offers no special processing advantage. Cost per gram is reasonable, while the unspecified ingredient grade limits confidence in premium sourcing.

Loading alternative details
Report alternatives

Sources

Published studies used for the product analysis and the top-ranked studies for each ingredient and goal.

  1. Meta-analysis of Glutamine on Immune Function and Post-Operative Complications of Patients With Colorectal Cancer.
    Yang T; Yan X; Cao Y; Bao T; Li G; Gu S; Xiong K; Xiao T · Frontiers in nutrition · 2021
    Meta-analysis2,201 participants31 studies pooledImmunity forGlutamine
  2. Glutamine granule-supplemented enteral nutrition maintains immunological function in severely burned patients.
    Peng X; Yan H; You Z; Wang P; Wang S · Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries · 2006
    Randomized trial48 participantsImmunity forGlutamine
  3. Parenteral glutamine supplementation improves serum albumin values in surgical cancer patients.
    Wu JM; Ho TW; Lai IR; Chen CN; Lin MT · Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2021
    Cohort study1,950 participantsImmunity forGlutamine
  4. Glutamine supplementation and immune function during heavy load training.
    Song QH; Xu RM; Zhang QH; Shen GQ; Ma M; Zhao XP; Guo YH; Wang Y · International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2015
    Randomized trial24 participantsImmunity forGlutamine
  5. Efficacy of Glutamine in Treating Severe Acute Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Dong S; Zhao Z; Li X; Chen Z; Jiang W; Zhou W · Frontiers in nutrition · 2023
    Meta-analysis1,201 participants30 studies pooledImmunity forGlutamine
  6. Decreased mortality and infectious morbidity in adult burn patients given enteral glutamine supplements: a prospective, controlled, randomized clinical trial.
    Garrel D; Patenaude J; Nedelec B; Samson L; Dorais J; Champoux J; D'Elia M; Bernier J · Critical care medicine · 2003
    Randomized trial45 participantsImmunity forGlutamine
  7. Effect of perioperative glutamine-enriched nutritional support on patients with colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Huang Y; Yang XZ; Qin SH; Zhang T; Xie M; Wang JW · World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2026
    Meta-analysis1,643 participants27 studies pooledImmunity forGlutamine
  8. Glutamine administration reduces Gram-negative bacteremia in severely burned patients: a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial versus isonitrogenous control.
    Wischmeyer PE; Lynch J; Liedel J; Wolfson R; Riehm J; Gottlieb L; Kahana M · Critical care medicine · 2001
    Randomized trial26 participantsImmunity forGlutamine