Nutrient quality
Benfotiamine provides a strong thiamin anchor, while most accompanying vitamin forms are generically named. Amounts are balanced, but the large quinoa-based addition has unclear incremental value.
| $ 89.10 | ||
| $ 80.99 | ||
Amazon | $ 80.97 | |
Vitacost | $ 89.99 |
Benfotiamine provides the main differentiated active at a substantial amount. A full set of B vitamins supports energy metabolism and general nutritional coverage.
The additional organic quinoa B-complex is supplied as one combined quantity without nutrient-level detail. Several vitamins are named only generically, which limits form assessment.
The longer supply may suit users seeking benfotiamine plus a moderate B complex, but it is not an efficient biotin product. It fits targeted thiamin use better than broad value-focused supplementation.
Benfotiamine provides a strong thiamin anchor, while most accompanying vitamin forms are generically named. Amounts are balanced, but the large quinoa-based addition has unclear incremental value.
Listed amounts are clear and no proprietary blend hides the formula. Generic vitamin naming, inactive ingredients, and complete directions leave some details unresolved.
The average rating is favorable and supported by a large evidence base. No specific feedback is supplied to judge repeated complaints or whether experience matches the intended use.
The supply provides weak cost efficiency for the active formula. Some additions provide limited value or focus.
| Ingredient | Amount per serving |
|---|---|
Thiamine (Vitamin B1) | 1.5 mg |
Riboflavin (Vitamin B2) | 1.7 mg |
Niacin (Vitamin B3) | 20 mg |
Vitamin B6 (Pyridoxine) | 2 mg |
Folate (Vitamin B9) | 665 mcg DFE |
Vitamin B12 (Cobalamin) | 6 mcg |
Biotin | 300 mcg |
Pantothenic Acid (Vitamin B5) | 10 mg |
Organic B Complex Vitamins (organic Quinoa) | 1000 mg |
Benfotiamine | 150 mg |
Benfotiamine provides a high-quality 150 mg anchor for targeted thiamine support despite the generic naming of the small additional vitamin B1 entry. The disclosed amount sits in the preferred potency range and is easy to verify. Cost efficiency is weak for thiamine alone, and capsule excipients are not described.
Standard biotin disclosure leaves the biologically active isomer unverified. The capsule format is conventional, but its material is not identified as vegetable. The biotin amount is too low for the collection’s hair and nail support target; exact label disclosure is helpful, while the broader multi-ingredient formula warrants a neutral value assessment.