Nutrient quality
The formula has a meaningful concept but incomplete or modest active dosing. Missing form detail or an unbalanced mineral load further limits quality.
| $ 24.84 | ||
Vitacost | $ 27.99 |
The large total amino-acid amount is appealing on paper, but grouped disclosure prevents a meaningful look at the amino-acid balance. Users cannot verify how much leucine or any other specific amino acid is included.
Vitamin D is listed clearly, while sodium remains too modest for demanding sweat replacement. A separate composite adds weight without explaining its individual components.
Watermelon flavor expands preference options, though the supplied data contain no specific taste or mixability evidence. People who care about precise workout dosing would benefit from a fully disclosed alternative.
The formula has a meaningful concept but incomplete or modest active dosing. Missing form detail or an unbalanced mineral load further limits quality.
One or more blends or zero-value entries prevent full active assessment. Complete inactive ingredients and full use directions are also not supplied.
The aggregate satisfaction signal is strong and the supplied volume is useful. No specific experience details are supplied to assess repeated complaints, tolerance, or purpose-related outcomes.
The formula provides some useful actives, but serving value is weak or uncertain. Hidden blends, incomplete dosing, or a mismatched mineral profile reduce competitiveness.
| Ingredient | Amount per serving |
|---|---|
Total Carbohydrates | 1 Gram(s) |
Vitamin D | 12.5 mcg |
Sodium | 170 mg |
Amino Acid Interfusion | 10 Gram(s) |
Efforsorb EnDura Composite | 2 Gram(s) |
The label does not identify the sodium source, which limits confidence in its quality. The listed sodium amount is too low for demanding exercise replenishment. Serving cost is favorable, though the formula is aimed mainly at amino acid supplementation rather than hydration.