Product Image

Pro Gainer High Protein Gainer Double Chocolate

4.6
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
(2169 ratings)
Sodium 340 mg
Protein (unspecified) 60 Gram(s)
Product Image
Score69
A practical choice for deliberate mass-gain nutrition, but the label detail and electrolyte coverage leave clear trade-offs. It is not a simple electrolyte product despite the useful sodium amount.
How scoring works
Powder
Quantity:5 lb(s) • (14 servings)
Goals:

Score 69

A practical choice for deliberate mass-gain nutrition, but the label detail and electrolyte coverage leave clear trade-offs. It is not a simple electrolyte product despite the useful sodium amount.
How scoring works
$84.99($6.07 per serving)
Vitacost
$ 100.93
iHerb
$ 99.07
Amazon
$ 84.99
Report prices

Analysis

60 g of protein is paired with 85 g of carbohydrate and 8 g of fat in a calorie-dense serving. That combination may help someone intentionally increasing energy intake, but it is excessive for many routine protein needs.

340 mg of sodium falls in a more useful range for some exercise replenishment. The heavy carbohydrate and calorie load, however, makes the serving a mass gainer rather than a focused hydration product.

The very large calorie, carbohydrate, and protein load suits mass-gain use rather than an ordinary protein snack. The costly serving makes sense only when the added calories and carbohydrate are genuinely wanted.

Who is it for
  • Deliberate mass-gain nutrition
  • People who struggle to meet higher calorie needs
  • People who prefer a measured powder serving
Best for
  • Higher-calorie shakes
  • Low-fat protein shakes
  • Protein nutrition rather than electrolyte replacement

Pros

  • 60 g protein in a mass-gain serving
  • 85 g carbohydrate supports higher energy intake
  • 340 mg sodium can contribute to exercise replenishment

Cons

  • High carbohydrate load for electrolyte-only use
  • Full inactive-ingredient details are not provided
  • Large serving is costly and narrowly suited

Warnings

  • The concentrated calorie and carbohydrate load can overshoot ordinary meal or snack needs.
  • The 340 mg sodium adds to daily intake and may not fit a sodium-restricted plan.
  • The very large protein serving may be more than needed at one sitting for many users.

Nutrient quality

70 High impact

The serving delivers substantial protein and carbohydrate for mass-gain use. Unknown protein sources and a very large calorie load make it unsuitable as a general supplement.

.

Ingredient transparency

68 High impact

Core macronutrient amounts and serving information are clearly shown. Protein sources, carbohydrate sources, full ingredients, and additives are not disclosed in the supplied facts.

.

Customer satisfaction

71 High impact

The supplied average rating is strong and supported by a large review pool. No review text is available to assess recurring complaints or firsthand taste, texture, or mixability.

.

Value for money

67 High impact

The very large protein and calorie serving partly justifies the high relative cost. The costly serving delivers substantial protein and calories but is only sensible for deliberate mass gain.

.
Report analysis

Ingredients

IngredientAmount per serving
Calories
650 {Calories}
Total Fat
8 Gram(s)
Cholesterol
60 mg
Sodium
340 mg
Total Carbohydrates
85 Gram(s)
Protein
60 Gram(s)
Vitamin A
0 Not Present
Calcium
0 Not Present
Vitamin E
0 Not Present
Riboflavin
0 Not Present
Vitamin B6
0 NP
Vitamin B12
0 NP
Pantothenic Acid
0 NP
Iodine
0 NP
Zinc
0 NP
Copper
0 NP
Chromium
0 NP
Chloride
0 NP
Vitamin C
0 NP
Iron
0 NP
Thiamine
0 NP
Niacin
0 NP
Folic Acid
0 NP
Biotin
0 NP
Phosphorus
0 NP
Magnesium
0 NP
Selenium
0 NP
Manganese
0 NP
Molybdenum
0 NP
Adults 18–50
Report overview
Sodium · 340 mg OverallScore68
D Active Ingredient Quality & BioavailabilityA- Dose, Safety & Label TransparencyB- Value

The sodium amount falls within a useful athletic replenishment range and is clearly disclosed. The sodium source is unspecified, and the very high carbohydrate load is poorly suited to a focused electrolyte use. The high cost is partly explained by the broader mass-gainer formula.

Loading alternative details
Report alternatives