Product Image

Ginkgo Leaf 2000 mg Alcohol-Free

Nature's Answer

4.8
(3873 ratings)
Ginkgo
Product Image
Score 55.0

This liquid extract provides an exceptionally high 2000mg stated dosage of Ginkgo biloba Leaf Extract in an alcohol-free form. While the liquid delivery is convenient and the "alcohol-free" aspect is a plus, the lack of standardization for ginkgo flavone glycosides and terpene lactones means the actual concentration of active compounds is unknown. The "2000 mg" likely refers to a raw leaf equivalent or a low-ratio extract, which makes it appear potent but lacks the scientific rigor of standardized extracts for consistent brain, cognitive, and cardiovascular benefits.

Quantity: 1 Fluid Ounce(s)Servings size: 1 mL (30 servings)
Selected goals:
Other goals:
Brain Health
Cognitive Support
Cardiovascular Support

Score 55.0

This liquid extract provides an exceptionally high 2000mg stated dosage of Ginkgo biloba Leaf Extract in an alcohol-free form. While the liquid delivery is convenient and the "alcohol-free" aspect is a plus, the lack of standardization for ginkgo flavone glycosides and terpene lactones means the actual concentration of active compounds is unknown. The "2000 mg" likely refers to a raw leaf equivalent or a low-ratio extract, which makes it appear potent but lacks the scientific rigor of standardized extracts for consistent brain, cognitive, and cardiovascular benefits.

Analysis

Nature's Answer Ginkgo Leaf offers a hefty 2000mg per serving of Ginkgo biloba Leaf Extract in a liquid, alcohol-free format, aimed at brain health, cognitive support, and cardiovascular support. The liquid form can be advantageous for absorption and ease of use, and the absence of alcohol is a benefit for many consumers. However, the prominent "2000 mg" is likely a raw herb equivalent or a low-ratio extract, and crucially, the product does not specify standardization for ginkgo flavone glycosides and terpene lactones. The scientific community and nutritionists overwhelmingly recommend standardized extracts (e.g., 24% flavone glycosides, 6% terpene lactones) because these are the components proven to exert therapeutic effects. Without this standardization, the actual potency and consistency of the active compounds remain unknown, rendering the "2000 mg" figure less meaningful in terms of clinical efficacy. Its moderate price per serving ($0.42) for an unstandardized, albeit high-volume, extract is a consideration against more effective standardized options.

Pros
  • Very high stated dosage (2000mg) which might appeal to some consumers
  • Liquid form (potentially better absorption, easier to swallow)
  • Alcohol-free formulation
  • From a well-known brand
  • High review count (3873)
Cons
  • Lacks crucial standardization for ginkgo flavone glycosides and terpene lactones, making actual active compound levels unknown
  • The 2000mg likely refers to raw leaf equivalent rather than a potent, standardized extract
  • Higher price per serving for an unstandardized product
Report analysis
$12.74($0.42 per serving)
iHerb
$ 12.74
Vitacost
$ 12.74
Amazon
$ 12.74
Report prices

Effectiveness for goals

Dosage, timing & forms

Safety & interactions

Ingredients

IngredientAmount per serving
Ginkgo biloba Leaf Extract 2000 mg
Gluten Free Adults 18–50 Kosher Dairy Free Women Vegetarian
Report overview

Categories

Despite the impressive 2000mg quantity, its value within the Ginkgo collection is compromised by the absence of standardization for active compounds, which is key for therapeutic efficacy.

Goals

The high volume of extract may offer some general support, but without standardization to active compounds, its precise efficacy for brain health is uncertain and likely less consistent than clinically proven extracts.
The "2000mg" is misleading without standardization; actual cognitive benefits from this form are speculative compared to products with guaranteed levels of ginkgo flavone glycosides and terpene lactones.
While Ginkgo can support circulation, the unstandardized nature of this high-volume extract means its effectiveness for robust cardiovascular benefits is not as reliably established as standardized alternatives.
Report alternatives