Nutrient quality
A meaningful protein amount supports routine supplementation without obvious excess. Vague source details, substantial iron, and added label complexity reduce formula quality and focus.
.| $ 27.97 |
The vanilla powder delivers 20 g of protein with a moderate carbohydrate amount. It can support plant-based meals and training when a flavored shake is preferred.
The plant-protein input is listed by total weight without a clear source breakdown or usable amino acid profile. Stevia is quantified, which may help users who are sensitive to its taste.
The short container and high serving cost compare poorly with simpler pea or soy isolates. Limited product-experience evidence leaves taste and texture uncertain.
A meaningful protein amount supports routine supplementation without obvious excess. Vague source details, substantial iron, and added label complexity reduce formula quality and focus.
.Protein and nutrition amounts are stated without a proprietary blend. Generic protein naming, an unquantified amino acid profile, missing directions, and absent non-active details reduce clarity.
.The aggregate rating is favorable, but it provides no specific experience evidence. The modest review count provides a limited but usable volume base, while no detailed feedback is supplied to assess taste, mixability, tolerance, or recurring complaints.
.Meaningful protein provides some formula value, but vague sourcing and low-value complexity weaken the offer. A short supply and high relative serving cost make it poorly competitive.
.| Ingredient | Amount per serving |
|---|---|
Calories | 130 Calorie(s) |
Total Fat | 2 Gram(s) |
Total Carbohydrates | 8 Gram(s) |
Calcium | 60 mg |
Iron | 7 mg |
Sodium | 260 mg |
Potassium | 50 mg |
Protein | 20 Gram(s) |
Plant Protein | 27.8 Gram(s) |
organic Stevia extract | 140 mg |
Amino Acid Profile | 0 NP |
The 260 mg sodium serving sits just below the preferred athletic range and may be modest during heavier sweat loss. The sodium source is not identified, which limits confidence in mineral quality. Its serving cost is relatively high for a formula aimed mainly at broader nutrition or performance rather than hydration.
The plant protein supplies iron without identifying its chemical form, and the powder format offers no stated gentleness feature. The 7 mg serving is low for iron-focused use. A high serving cost and lack of targeted absorption cofactors weaken its fit for this collection.