Nutrient quality
A substantial pea-protein amount and minimal carbohydrate provide focused nutrition without active padding. Missing amino acid details plus substantial sodium and iron temper the formula assessment.
.| $ 29.02 | ||
Vitacost | $ 30.93 | |
Vitacost | $ 30.93 | |
Daily Vita | $ 28.20 | |
Amazon | $ 19.99 | |
| $ 29.41 |
The unflavored powder provides 24 g of protein with very little carbohydrate. It fits post-training use and can be mixed into foods without adding a strong flavor profile.
Iron is substantial, while sodium is relatively high for a single-source protein powder. Potassium is present only in a modest amount, so the product is not balanced electrolyte support.
Serving value is favorable for a large pea-protein dose. The supplied data do not include a complete ingredient panel or amino acid profile.
A substantial pea-protein amount and minimal carbohydrate provide focused nutrition without active padding. Missing amino acid details plus substantial sodium and iron temper the formula assessment.
.All nutrition amounts are explicit and no hidden blend is shown. Missing directions, non-active ingredients, protein processing, and mineral forms prevent full transparency.
.The aggregate rating is moderately favorable, but it provides no specific experience evidence. The very large review count gives the aggregate signal a strong volume base, while no detailed feedback is supplied to assess taste, mixability, tolerance, or recurring complaints.
.Substantial protein yield and a low relative serving cost provide strong value without formula inflation. Missing quality details do little to offset its clear category economy.
.| Ingredient | Amount per serving |
|---|---|
Calories | 120 Calorie(s) |
Total Fat | 2 Gram(s) |
Cholesterol | 0 mg |
Sodium | 320 mg |
Total Carbohydrates | 1 Gram(s) |
Protein | 24 Gram(s) |
Vitamin D | 0 mcg |
Iron | 8 mg |
Calcium | 43 mg |
Potassium | 83 mg |
Its 320 mg sodium amount sits in the preferred athletic replenishment range. The sodium source and supporting mineral forms are not fully identified, and no buffering mineral is shown. The sodium amount fits athletic replacement and the low-carbohydrate serving is economical, though supporting mineral forms are unclear.
Iron is a minor nutrient contribution rather than an effective standalone dose. The chemical form is not disclosed, and no qualifying absorption cofactors are present. The convenient scoop does not offset poor iron-focused value.