Nutrient quality
The organic positioning is not supported by disclosed protein sources or amino-acid details. The protein amount is meaningful, with iron and calcium providing secondary nutrition.
.| $ 28.03 | ||
Vitacost | $ 23.13 | |
Amazon | $ 19.32 |
Twenty-two grams of protein provide a strong serving for daily nutrition and exercise recovery. The powder also supplies 7.2 mg iron and 150 mg calcium at a favorable recurring value.
The source blend, amino profile, iron form, and complete inactive ingredients are not shown. Nine grams of carbohydrate and 290 mg sodium make the profile less minimal than several competing plant powders.
It fits budget-conscious plant-based users who mainly need protein quantity. Anyone choosing it for iron, allergen avoidance, or clean-label reasons should verify the package details first.
The organic positioning is not supported by disclosed protein sources or amino-acid details. The protein amount is meaningful, with iron and calcium providing secondary nutrition.
.Protein and basic nutrition amounts are stated clearly. The supplied data does not include protein sources, flavoring, or other inactive ingredients.
.The aggregate satisfaction measure and review volume provide a useful first impression. Missing firsthand feedback leaves repeat complaints and real-world purpose fit uncertain.
.The low serving cost supports the meaningful protein amount well. Each serving provides strong value despite poor source disclosure.
.| Ingredient | Amount per serving |
|---|---|
Calories | 150 Calorie(s) |
Total Fat | 4 Gram(s) |
Cholesterol | 0 mg |
Sodium | 290 mg |
Total Carbohydrates | 9 Gram(s) |
Protein | 22 Gram(s) |
Vitamin D | 0 mcg |
Calcium | 150 mg |
Iron | 7.2 mg |
Potassium | 40 mg |
The sodium amount approaches a useful hydration range but is secondary to the protein-focused formula. Its source and the potassium form are not disclosed, and no buffering system is identified. The serving cost is reasonable for protein nutrition, though the electrolyte profile remains basic.
The chemical form of iron is not disclosed, and the loose powder allows flexible mixing but is not a slow-release or liquid iron format. The iron amount is below the effective supplemental range; no qualifying vitamin C, folate, or vitamin B12 support is listed. Protein accounts for much of the serving cost while the iron contribution stays modest; the serving cost is above the collection’s poor-value threshold.