Nutrient quality
Rice protein offers a focused plant-based protein source without obvious excessive dosing. Moderate protein and small phosphorus amounts limit its strength for either stated category.
. Vitacost | $ 25.57 | |
| $ 23.24 | ||
| $ 23.24 |
An 11 g rice-protein serving provides a plant-based way to add protein without listed fat or cholesterol. The low carbohydrate amount keeps the serving focused, though users wanting a full post-workout dose may need more than one serving or other protein sources.
Phosphorus is present at a small amount, with additional iron and manganese. Those minerals add modest nutritional value but do not turn the powder into a broad micronutrient supplement.
The rice source is identified as organic, but processing, amino-acid profile, and inactive chocolate-flavor ingredients are not supplied. Those omissions make protein completeness, sweeteners, allergen exposure, and taste-related tolerance harder to judge.
Rice protein offers a focused plant-based protein source without obvious excessive dosing. Moderate protein and small phosphorus amounts limit its strength for either stated category.
.All listed nutrition components have specific amounts and no hidden blend is shown. Missing serving directions, flavor ingredients, protein processing, and mineral forms reduce full clarity.
.The aggregate rating is favorable and is supported by a useful number of reviews. No review comments are supplied, so taste, mixability, tolerance, and repeated complaints remain unknown.
.The serving provides reasonable value for a moderate amount of plant protein. Small phosphorus content and missing source-quality details keep it from standing out in either category.
.| Ingredient | Amount per serving |
|---|---|
Calories | 60 Calorie(s) |
Total Fat | 0 Gram(s) |
Cholesterol | 0 mg |
Total Carbohydrate | 2 Gram(s) |
Protein | 11 Gram(s) |
Iron | 1 mg |
Phosphorus | 50 mg |
Manganese | 520 mcg |
Phosphorus is clearly quantified at 50 mg, but its source compound is not identified. The amount is incidental rather than targeted, although one scoop is practical. Cost efficiency is good, yet the powder is a weak choice when phosphorus support is the main goal.