Product Image

Magnelevures

UNDA specialties
4.7
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
(56 ratings)
Gluthathione 10 mg
Product Image
Score58
Magnesium provides the main reason to use this sachet. Glutathione and taurine are too modest to justify choosing it for antioxidant or amino-acid support.
How scoring works
Quantity:30 Sachet(s) • (30 servings)
Goals:

Score 58

Magnesium provides the main reason to use this sachet. Glutathione and taurine are too modest to justify choosing it for antioxidant or amino-acid support.
How scoring works
$57.00($1.90 per serving)
Pure Formulas
$ 57.00
Report prices

Analysis

Magnesium at 150 mg is the main active and is supported by small amounts of thiamine and vitamin B6. The sachet format may be convenient for users who prefer a mixed drink over tablets.

Glutathione is supplied at only 10 mg, which is too small to make the product a meaningful direct glutathione source. Its form and delivery are also unspecified, while 100 mg of taurine adds only modest depth.

The formula is best assessed as a magnesium product rather than an antioxidant formula. A high serving cost and low amounts of the supporting actives weaken its overall value.

Who is it for
  • Adults who prefer powdered magnesium sachets
  • Users seeking a moderate magnesium serving
  • People not relying on the product for meaningful glutathione intake
Best for
  • Convenient drink-mix magnesium
  • Moderate daily mineral support
  • Users who dislike capsules

Pros

  • Provides 150 mg of magnesium
  • Includes modest B-vitamin support
  • Convenient single-serving sachets
  • All active amounts are listed

Cons

  • Only 10 mg of glutathione
  • Glutathione form and delivery are unspecified
  • Only 100 mg of taurine
  • High serving cost
  • Poor fit for glutathione-focused use

Warnings

  • Magnesium may cause loose stools or digestive discomfort in sensitive users

Nutrient quality

54 Moderate impact

Magnesium has a named form, while glutathione lacks reduced or enhanced delivery details. Magnesium is useful, but the glutathione amount is far too small for meaningful direct support.

.

Ingredient transparency

82 Highest impact

Every listed active ingredient has a specific amount. Usage and inactive-ingredient details remain incomplete.

.

Customer satisfaction

60 Moderate impact

The average rating is consistently strong. The moderate feedback pool provides useful but limited confidence.

.

Value for money

29 Situational impact

The high price is not justified by the tiny glutathione amount. Serving cost is very high for weak direct glutathione support.

.
Report analysis

Ingredients

IngredientAmount per serving
Calories
10 Calorie(s)
Total Carbohydrates
2 Gram(s)
Thiamine (Thiamine Hydrochloride)
 2.1 mg
Vitamin B6 (Pyridoxine Hydrochloride)
 3 mg
Magnesium (Magnesium L-5-oxo-proline)
 150 mg
L-Glutathione
10 mg
Taurine
100 mg
Adults 18–50
Report overview
Gluthathione · 10 mg OverallScore20
F Active Ingredient Quality & BioavailabilityF Dose, Safety & Label TransparencyF Value
Direct glutathione is present, but the amount is too small for meaningful systemic support. The label does not verify reduced or enhanced delivery and gives no branded purity signal. A high serving cost makes the low-dose formula poor value for glutathione.
View ingredientView products
Loading alternative details
84 Performance

L-Glutathione (Reduced) 500 mg

California Gold Nutrition
<p>Its label clearly provides 500 mg of L-Glutathione, Reduced, making it a more clearly defined glutathione option. Compared with the original, its ingredient and goal alignment is stronger, although the input does not provide independent testing or absorption evidence.</p>
68 Performance

Deluxe Scavengers

Metabolic Maintenance
<p>Its label clearly provides 100 mg of Coenzyme Q10, making it a more clearly defined glutathione option. Compared with the original, its ingredient and goal alignment is stronger, although the input does not provide independent testing or absorption evidence.</p>
74 Performance

Optimal Liposomal Glutathione Plus

Seeking Health
<p>Its label clearly provides 350 mg of L-Glutathione, making it a more clearly defined glutathione option. Compared with the original, its ingredient and goal alignment is stronger, although the input does not provide independent testing or absorption evidence.</p>
79 Budget

Glutathione 500 mg

Nutricost
<p>Its label clearly provides 500 mg of L-Glutathione, preserving relevant glutathione coverage. Compared with the original, it lowers the serving cost, although the input does not provide independent testing or absorption evidence.</p>
76 Budget

L-Glutathione 500 mg

AN Amazing Nutrition Amazing Formulas
<p>Its label clearly provides 500 mg of L-Glutathione, preserving relevant glutathione coverage. Compared with the original, it lowers the serving cost, although the input does not provide independent testing or absorption evidence.</p>
75 Budget

Reduced Glutathione Complex 50 mg Orange Flavored

Source Naturals
<p>Its label clearly provides 50 mg of L-Glutathione, preserving relevant glutathione coverage. Compared with the original, it lowers the serving cost, although the input does not provide independent testing or absorption evidence.</p>
76 Value

Reduced Glutathione 250 mg

Source Naturals
<p>Its label clearly provides 250 mg of L-Glutathione, Reduced, keeping the formula relevant to glutathione. Compared with the original, the lower serving cost and ingredient detail create a useful quality-to-cost balance, although the input does not provide independent testing or absorption evidence.</p>
72 Value

L-Glutathione 100 mg

Bluebonnet
<p>Its label clearly provides 100 mg of L-Glutathione, Reduced, keeping the formula relevant to glutathione. Compared with the original, the lower serving cost and ingredient detail create a useful quality-to-cost balance, although the input does not provide independent testing or absorption evidence.</p>
79 Value

Mega-Liposomal Glutathione+ 750 mg Organic Fruit Flavor

Aurora NutraScience
<p>Its label clearly provides 750 mg of L-Glutathione, keeping the formula relevant to glutathione. Compared with the original, the lower serving cost and ingredient detail create a useful quality-to-cost balance, although the input does not provide independent testing or absorption evidence.</p>
Report alternatives