Nutrient quality
Large macronutrient amounts support intentional mass gain. An aggressive nutrition load, weak alignment with several goals, and unclear source quality reduce suitability.
. BodyBuilding.com | $ 53.74 | |
| $ 56.42 |
The formula provides a very large calorie load with substantial protein and carbohydrates. It can help hard gainers or highly active users who struggle to consume enough food.
Sodium is substantial, while potassium is only moderate and neither mineral form is named. Chromium reaches a useful amount but lacks a disclosed chemical form or branded source.
The powder is not a sensible weight-loss or routine heart-health option because most of its energy comes from a very large carbohydrate serving. Buyers wanting protein, electrolytes, or chromium alone can use much more focused products.
Large macronutrient amounts support intentional mass gain. An aggressive nutrition load, weak alignment with several goals, and unclear source quality reduce suitability.
.Some core nutrition amounts are clear enough to evaluate. Missing complete ingredients, use directions, or blend details create meaningful gaps.
.Aggregate satisfaction data are favorable. Specific firsthand comments were not supplied, leaving repeated complaints and purpose fit uncertain.
.Formula weaknesses limit value for routine use. Better-balanced or more transparent alternatives are likely to be more practical.
.A large protein and carbohydrate serving directly supports calorie intake, glycogen replacement, and muscle-building nutrition. Sodium and potassium add some electrolyte replacement for demanding training or intentional mass gain.
The formula is effective for a narrow high-calorie use case rather than general workout support. Mineral forms and protein-source details are not provided, limiting quality assessment despite clear macronutrient amounts.
A large protein amount can support lean-mass preservation, but the serving is built for weight gain with a very high energy and carbohydrate load. Chromium adds only limited metabolic relevance because its form is not disclosed.
Using the full serving during a calorie deficit would make energy control difficult for most people. It is better suited to mass gain or very high energy needs than weight loss.
| Ingredient | Amount per serving |
|---|---|
Calories | 720 Calorie(s) |
Total Fat | 2 Gram(s) |
Cholesterol | 0 mg |
Total Carbohydrate | 125 Gram(s) |
Protein | 50 Gram(s) |
Calcium | 30 mg |
Chromium | 200 mcg |
Sodium | 580 mg |
Potassium | 150 mg |
The sodium amount is well suited to substantial sweat replacement and potassium adds some electrolyte support. Mineral sources are not identified, and the very large carbohydrate load makes the formula poorly suited to routine hydration. Neutral value reflects that most of the high serving cost buys mass-gainer nutrition rather than electrolytes.
An undisclosed chemical form limits confidence in chromium absorption, while no branded source adds validation. The amount is well aligned with focused metabolic support. The cost per standard chromium amount is high.
Food-derived potassium has an unspecified form, so its absorption and buffering properties cannot be assessed. The amount just reaches the moderate-dose range but remains far below a high-potency serving. A very costly serving makes the formula poor value for potassium, while its large carbohydrate and protein load serves a different purpose.
Published studies used for the product analysis and the top-ranked studies for each ingredient and goal.