Nutrient quality
A meaningful protein amount supports basic nutrition without obvious overdosing. Hidden blend contents and substantial sodium make the broad formula difficult to judge and potentially padding-heavy.
.| $ 59.99 | ||
| $ 49.99 | ||
| $ 59.99 |
The chocolate powder provides 22 g of protein with moderate fat and carbohydrate. A greens blend and enzyme blend broaden the label, but their individual contributions cannot be evaluated.
Nearly all distinctive ingredients sit inside proprietary blends, so the actual protein sources and enzyme activities are unknown. Sodium is high enough to matter for users who drink the powder outside training.
The serving is expensive compared with transparent single-source proteins. Aggregate satisfaction cannot establish ingredient quality, dose adequacy, or digestive benefit.
A meaningful protein amount supports basic nutrition without obvious overdosing. Hidden blend contents and substantial sodium make the broad formula difficult to judge and potentially padding-heavy.
.Aggregate weights are supplied, but multiple branded blends conceal their ingredients and individual doses. Missing directions and non-active ingredients further limit label clarity.
.The aggregate rating is very favorable, but it provides no specific experience evidence. The moderate review count provides a limited but usable volume base, while no detailed feedback is supplied to assess taste, mixability, tolerance, or recurring complaints.
.Meaningful protein provides a useful core, but hidden extras do not clearly justify premium positioning. The very high relative serving cost makes the product poorly competitive.
.| Ingredient | Amount per serving |
|---|---|
Calories | 130 Calorie(s) |
Total Fat | 3 Gram(s) |
Total Carbohydrate | 5 Gram(s) |
Protein | 22 Gram(s) |
Calcium | 38 mg |
Iron | 7 mg |
Sodium | 390 mg |
Ora Protein, Superfood & Greens Blend | 27.41 Gram(s) |
Ora Enzyme Blend | 100 mg |
The sodium amount fits athletic replenishment needs, but the mineral source is not disclosed. No potassium, magnesium, trace minerals, or buffering forms round out the electrolyte profile. A high serving cost and opaque food blends make it only a partial fit for sodium-focused use.
The iron amount is listed, but its chemical form is not disclosed. The 7 mg serving is low for targeted supplementation, while no qualifying vitamin C, vitamin B12, or folate support is listed. Very high serving cost and missing form details make the protein powder poor value for iron.