Nutrient quality
Plant protein and iron provide a useful nutrition combination, but their forms are not specified. The protein amount is modest compared with many dedicated powders, while the iron amount remains below focused supplemental levels.
. Vitacost | $ 38.19 | |
Daily Vita | $ 38.21 |
The formula supplies 15 g of plant protein with only 90 calories, 4 g of carbohydrate, and 1.5 g of fat. That balance provides a useful moderate protein serving without cholesterol or sodium.
Iron reaches 9.3 mg, but the source compound is not identified. The amount is meaningful nutritionally yet remains less suitable than a dedicated, clearly specified iron supplement.
Only 12 servings and a high recurring cost create poor long-term value. It best fits someone who wants this specific plant-protein format and accepts the premium.
Plant protein and iron provide a useful nutrition combination, but their forms are not specified. The protein amount is modest compared with many dedicated powders, while the iron amount remains below focused supplemental levels.
.Protein, iron, and nutrition amounts are clear. The plant source, amino acid profile, iron form, complete directions, and non-active ingredients are missing.
.The aggregate rating is good and based on a small feedback volume. Specific experience details are missing, so recurring problems and purpose fit remain uncertain.
.Useful protein cannot justify the premium serving cost and missing source details. Serving value is poor because the package is very short.
.| Ingredient | Amount per serving |
|---|---|
Calories | 90 Calorie(s) |
Total Fat | 1.5 Gram(s) |
Cholesterol | 0 mg |
Sodium | 0 mg |
Total Carbohydrates | 4 Gram(s) |
Protein | 15 Gram(s) |
Vitamin D | 0 mcg |
Calcium | 36 mg |
Iron | 9.3 mg |
Potassium | 0 mg |
The just over nine mg iron serving is below the effective target range for focused supplementation. The label states an iron amount but does not identify the iron compound. No qualifying vitamin C, folate, or vitamin B12 support is provided. Cost per serving is far above the collection benchmark.