Nutrient quality
A meaningful protein amount and lean profile provide focused nutrition without excessive sodium or obvious padding. Missing source and amino acid details limit confidence in protein quality.
. Vitacost | $ 29.67 | |
| $ 26.97 |
A serving provides 20 g of protein with low fat and carbohydrate. Vitamin C and iron add useful nutritional breadth.
The supplied information does not identify the protein source or amino acid profile. That gap makes it difficult to judge protein quality or screen source-specific sensitivities.
The smaller container is less economical than the larger version. Limited customer-experience evidence also leaves taste and mixability uncertain.
A meaningful protein amount and lean profile provide focused nutrition without excessive sodium or obvious padding. Missing source and amino acid details limit confidence in protein quality.
.Nutrition amounts are explicit and no hidden blend is shown. Generic protein naming, missing directions, and absent non-active details reduce label clarity.
.The aggregate rating is favorable, but it provides no specific experience evidence. The modest review count provides a limited but usable volume base, while no detailed feedback is supplied to assess taste, mixability, tolerance, or recurring complaints.
.Meaningful protein and a lean profile provide fair value without active padding. The smaller supply and higher relative cost reduce category competitiveness.
.| Ingredient | Amount per serving |
|---|---|
Calories | 100 Calorie(s) |
Total Fat | 2 Gram(s) |
Total Carbohydrates | 2 Gram(s) |
Protein | 20 Gram(s) |
Vitamin C | 43 mg |
Calcium | 39 mg |
Iron | 5 mg |
Sodium | 160 mg |
Its 160 mg sodium amount is too low for dependable replacement during intense exercise. The sodium source is not identified, and no supporting electrolytes or buffering minerals broaden the formula. The low-carbohydrate protein serving is transparent but lacks enough sodium and supporting electrolytes for hard training.