Nutrient quality
A broad antioxidant blend uses several standardized botanical extracts. Several amounts are useful but not consistently strong.
| $ 24.49 | ||
| $ 24.18 | ||
Vitacost | $ 26.55 | |
Daily Vita | $ 23.10 | |
Amazon | $ 21.50 |
Green tea, turmeric, quercetin, milk thistle, grape seed, bilberry, and other botanicals provide broad antioxidant coverage. The formula is coherent for general oxidative-stress support but spreads its serving across many ingredients.
EGCG, curcuminoid strength, silymarin percentage, and several other active-marker yields are not disclosed. Ginkgo, ginger, hawthorn, bilberry, and bromelain are also below amounts used in more focused products.
Two capsules and a 60-serving supply make it practical for general use. It is not a strong vision formula because lutein, zeaxanthin, and meaningful bilberry amounts are absent.
A broad antioxidant blend uses several standardized botanical extracts. Several amounts are useful but not consistently strong.
Active ingredients have stated amounts without a proprietary blend. Important standardization, activity, or form details remain missing.
The aggregate rating is favorable and is supported by substantial review volume. No specific comments are supplied, so repeated complaints and purpose alignment cannot be confirmed directly.
Value is reasonable for the effective doses and ingredient forms. Lightly dosed additions or premium pricing weaken competitiveness.
Green tea catechins, turmeric curcuminoids, quercetin, grape seed, and bilberry provide a focused antioxidant and inflammation-related botanical profile. The formula addresses oxidative stress and inflammatory signaling without a long multivitamin base.
EGCG yield, caffeine content, curcuminoid standardization strength, and several extract potencies are incomplete. The doses are moderate and do not provide mitochondrial, structural, omega-3, or NAD-pathway coverage.
Bilberry and ginkgo provide limited circulation and antioxidant relevance for the eye within a broader antioxidant blend. The product lacks lutein, zeaxanthin, DHA, and a clinically structured ocular nutrient core.
Both bilberry and ginkgo are below stronger targeted amounts, and standardization is incomplete. Ginkgo may increase bleeding risk with anticoagulant or antiplatelet medicines.
| Ingredient | Amount per serving |
|---|---|
Green Tea extract (Catechins) | 200 mg |
Milk Thistle extract (Silymarin) | 100 mg |
Turmeric root extract (Curcuminoids) | 100 mg |
Quercetin (Quercetin Dihydrate) | 100 mg |
Bromelain (Pineapple Extract) | 85 mg |
Rosemary | 50 mg |
Grape seed extract (Polyphenols) | 30 mg |
Ginkgo biloba extract (Ginkgoflavonglycosides) | 30 mg |
Ginger | 30 mg |
Hawthorn extract | 30 mg |
Cranberry powder | 20 mg |
Bilberry extract | 20 mg |
The whole-herb rosemary lacks extract, marker, and plant-part detail. The 50 mg whole-herb amount is meaningful, though it is not identified as an extract. The near-median serving cost provides reasonable value.
85 mg offers only a modest amount within the broader formula. Missing enzyme activity units prevent a reliable judgment of true proteolytic potency. Standard delivery lacks acid protection for the systemic goal, and cost efficiency is poor.
Published studies used for the product analysis and the top-ranked studies for each ingredient and goal.