Product Image

Syntha-6 Cookies & Cream

BSN
4.6
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
(1113 ratings)
Sodium 170 mg
Phosphorus 100 mg
Potassium 190 mg
Product Image
Score67
A useful protein powder with only small, poorly specified mineral contributions. It is better suited to general protein intake than hydration or heart-focused use.
How scoring works
Quantity:2 lb(s) • (30 servings)
Goals:

Score 67

A useful protein powder with only small, poorly specified mineral contributions. It is better suited to general protein intake than hydration or heart-focused use.
How scoring works
$45.07($1.50 per serving)
iHerb
$ 50.40
Vitacost
$ 45.07
Amazon
$ 52.11
Report prices

Analysis

The powder supplies 22 g of protein, which is its main nutritional strength. Potassium, sodium, phosphorus, and calcium appear only in modest amounts and are secondary to the protein blend.

None of the mineral forms is identified, limiting assessment of their quality. The serving also contains 6 g of fat and 60 mg of cholesterol, which may not fit every heart-focused diet.

It works as a flavored protein powder for people who value taste and macronutrients. Anyone seeking meaningful electrolyte replacement or dedicated cardiovascular support should choose a more targeted formula.

Who is it for
  • Adults seeking a flavored protein powder
  • People prioritizing protein over electrolyte replacement
  • Users whose diet accommodates its fat and cholesterol
Best for
  • General protein supplementation
  • Post-exercise nutrition when heavy electrolyte replacement is unnecessary
  • Users who prefer a dessert-style flavor

Pros

  • Provides 22 g of protein
  • Includes small amounts of several minerals
  • Offers a complete macronutrient serving

Cons

  • Mineral forms are not disclosed
  • Potassium and sodium amounts are modest
  • Contains 6 g of fat and 60 mg of cholesterol

Warnings

  • People managing dietary cholesterol or fat for cardiovascular reasons should account for the 60 mg cholesterol and 6 g fat per serving.

Nutrient quality

72 High impact

The protein dose is useful and fits the product’s core purpose. Missing protein-source details and a less protein-dense macronutrient profile are important weaknesses.

.

Ingredient transparency

63 Moderate impact

Total protein and basic nutrition amounts are disclosed. Protein-source details and non-active ingredients remain unclear.

.

Customer satisfaction

66 High impact

The supplied average rating is positive but trails stronger category results. No specific review comments were supplied, so repeated negative experiences cannot be assessed.

.

Value for money

65 High impact

The protein amount provides reasonable practical value. Limited source disclosure and a less protein-dense serving reduce category competitiveness.

.
Report analysis

Ingredients

IngredientAmount per serving
Calories
198 {Calories}
Total Fat
6 g
Cholesterol
60 mg
Total Carbohydrates
14 g
Protein
22 g
Calcium
100 mg
Phosphorus
100 mg
Sodium
170 mg
Potassium
190 mg
Adults 18–50
Report overview
Sodium · 170 mg OverallScore54
D- Active Ingredient Quality & BioavailabilityD+ Dose, Safety & Label TransparencyB+ Value

The sodium amount is too low for substantial sweat replacement, making it a weak electrolyte-focused choice. Potassium is included, but neither its form nor the sodium source is disclosed. Its cost per serving is reasonable, but the limited sodium dose weakens its value for this use.

Phosphorus · 100 mg OverallScore44
F Active Ingredient Quality & BioavailabilityA+ Dose, Safety & Label TransparencyF Value

The elemental phosphorus amount is targeted, but its source compound is not identified. A small powder serving is practical to use. The per-serving cost is high compared with the collection benchmark.

Potassium · 190 mg OverallScore41
F Active Ingredient Quality & BioavailabilityC Dose, Safety & Label TransparencyD- Value

The 190 mg amount offers moderate potassium support but stays below an effective daily target. The protein-powder context suggests a food-derived source, yet the chemical form is not identified. Cost efficiency is weak because the serving remains under the effective range.

Loading alternative details
Report alternatives