ConcenTrace Trace Mineral Drops

ConcenTrace Trace Mineral Drops

Trace Minerals4.6 (41,360 ratings)
Format:Liquid Quantity: 4 Liquid(s) · 48 servings
Goals

Product analysis

45 out of 100

ConcenTrace Trace Mineral Drops mainly provide magnesium to support normal energy and mineral functions and help fill a dietary gap. Their liquid form does not establish an advantage in absorption, and the exact mineral forms are unspecified.

AI assessment of the formula, label and price. How scoring works

Nutrient Quality20

The mineral forms are unspecified, so an absorption advantage cannot be established. The meaningful magnesium contribution is a nutritional point rather than proof of a better-quality form.

Ingredient Transparency63

The declared mineral amounts are stated, making it possible to check the serving contribution. Exact forms are not disclosed, limiting comparisons of the mineral types supplied.

Value For Money25

Magnesium value remains uncertain because its form is unspecified, while the small boron contribution is costly. Some other mineral comparisons are more favorable, but they do not establish the worth of the full mix.

Customer Satisfaction89

Customer feedback is positive across tens of thousands of ratings. The large feedback base describes satisfaction broadly without proving benefits for mood, stress or energy.

Product Focus55

Magnesium provides the clearest nutritional role, especially when intake is low. The many listed goals do not establish routine improvements in mood, stress or testosterone when nutrition is already adequate.

Format
Liquid
Container
4 Liquid(s)
Per serving
$0.56
Customer rating
4.6 · 41,360 ratings
Report analysis

Goals

Energy
Impact
Moderate effect
D+ Ingredient FitF PathwaysA- EvidenceA+ Formulation Logic
Magnesium · 250 mgPotassium · 3 mg

Magnesium supports normal energy metabolism, and inadequate intake can contribute to tiredness and weakness. The 250 mg amount provides meaningful nutritional support, while the 3 mg potassium is a small contribution; extra energy above nutrient adequacy is not assumed.

How this product is rated for Energy

Ingredient fit50

Magnesium supplies the relevant contribution within a trace-mineral mixture. The relevant ingredients provide a partial saved exposure match.
Goal fit
Magnesium supplies the relevant contribution within a trace-mineral mixture.
Dose adequacy
The relevant ingredients provide a partial saved exposure match.

Pathways0

The saved findings show no meaningful coverage of the core energy pathways.
Depth
The saved findings show no meaningful coverage of the core energy pathways.
Breadth
No core area reaches the saved meaningful-coverage threshold.

Evidence88

Magnesium leads the saved evidence finding. The effective ingredients match the saved preparation references.
Evidence strength
Magnesium is the strongest effective ingredient in the saved finding.
Studied preparation
The effective ingredients match the saved preparation references.

Formulation logic100

The assessed ingredients have no missing required partner or listed conflict. All of the single ingredient's exposure reach the saved minimum level.
Partner coverage
The assessed ingredients can contribute alone or have their required partner.
Conflicts
No listed conflict was found in the supplied assessment.
Effective doses
All of the single ingredient's exposure reach the saved minimum level.
Study evidence
Magnesium Supportive 4 studies
Potassium Supportive 2 studies
Impact
High effect
C Ingredient FitD+ PathwaysA- EvidenceA+ Formulation Logic
Magnesium · 250 mgBoron · 1 mg

Magnesium supports normal energy and mineral metabolism and can help fill a dietary gap. The 250 mg per serving provides a substantial but partial amount comparison. This does not establish improved energy, sleep or stress outcomes with adequate intake, and the comparison is not a safety judgment. The small boron amount is excluded.

How this product is rated for Everyday Health

Ingredient fit60

Magnesium is the sole recognized contributor; other actives and several linked purposes reduce focus.
Goal fit
Magnesium is the sole recognized contributor; other actives and several linked purposes reduce focus.
Dose adequacy
Magnesium receives substantial but partial exposure recognition.

Pathways50

Energy metabolism leads, with a smaller bone and mineral contribution.
Depth
Energy metabolism receives the strongest saved coverage.
Breadth
Only energy metabolism reaches the coverage threshold.

Evidence86

Magnesium leads the saved evidence comparison; its contribution concerns nutrient availability when intake is low.
Evidence strength
Magnesium supplies the strongest saved evidence contribution, without establishing added benefit above nutritional adequacy.
Studied preparation
All 1 ingredients meeting the amount threshold pass the preparation comparison; named forms receive no superiority bonus.

Formulation logic100

Recognized ingredients have no missing required partner or listed conflict; their amount findings are described separately.
Partner coverage
No credited ingredient lacks a required partner.
Conflicts
No listed ingredient conflict was found.
Effective doses
All 1 included ingredients reach the minimum exposure threshold, which is not a proven clinical benefit threshold.
Study evidence
Boron Supportive 6 studies
Magnesium Supportive 114 studies
Impact
Moderate effect
D Ingredient FitD- PathwaysA- EvidenceA+ Formulation Logic
Magnesium · 250 mg

Magnesium provides the main heart-related contribution at 250 mg per serving, supporting electrolyte balance and vascular tone. The supplied blood-pressure evidence is limited and inconsistent; 3 mg potassium adds little to the nutritional amount.

How this product is rated for Heart Health

Ingredient fit48

1 ingredients contribute to the saved heart-health assessment, within the product's overall mix of actives. The counted amounts have a partial match to the saved dose comparison.
Goal fit
1 ingredients contribute to the saved heart-health assessment, within the product's overall mix of actives.
Dose adequacy
The counted amounts have a partial match to the saved dose comparison.

Pathways45

The strongest saved contribution concerns electrolyte and vascular-tone balance. One assessed area reaches the saved breadth threshold.
Depth
The strongest saved contribution concerns electrolyte and vascular-tone balance.
Breadth
One assessed area reaches the saved breadth threshold.

Evidence89

Magnesium provides the strongest saved evidence finding at the assessed amount.
Evidence strength
Magnesium provides the strongest saved evidence finding at the assessed amount.
Studied preparation
The counted preparations meet the saved studied-preparation criteria.

Formulation logic100

The counted ingredients work independently or have their required partners. No configured ingredient conflict was found in the supplied facts.
Partner coverage
The counted ingredients work independently or have their required partners.
Conflicts
No configured ingredient conflict was found in the supplied facts.
Effective doses
1 of 1 counted ingredients meet the saved minimum amount comparison.
Study evidence
Magnesium Supportive 158 studies
Potassium Supportive 182 studies
Stress Relief
Impact
Moderate effect
D Ingredient FitF PathwaysB EvidenceA+ Formulation Logic
Magnesium · 250 mg

If you’re low in magnesium, taking it may help with stress. Whether it brings lasting relief from everyday stress more broadly is uncertain. The mineral amount is known, but the magnesium form is unspecified, so it offers no basis for expecting a particular absorption advantage.

How this product is rated for Stress Relief

Ingredient fit48

Magnesium provides a conditional connection to stress.
Goal fit
Magnesium provides a conditional connection to stress.
Dose adequacy
The selected serving provides 250 mg magnesium, compared with the 350 mg reference; this is not a prediction of benefit.

Pathways20

Magnesium relates mainly to calming nerve activity.
Depth
Magnesium relates mainly to calming nerve activity.
Breadth
Magnesium relates mainly to calming nerve activity.

Evidence76

Magnesium’s possible benefit is conditional, especially on low magnesium levels.
Evidence strength
Magnesium’s possible benefit is conditional, especially on low magnesium levels.
Studied preparation
Magnesium is identified, but its source form is unspecified.

Formulation logic100

No particular ingredient conflict is identified.
Partner coverage
No required ingredient partner is missing.
Conflicts
No particular ingredient conflict is identified.
Effective doses
The selected serving provides 250 mg magnesium, compared with the 350 mg reference; this is not a prediction of benefit.
Study evidence
Magnesium Supportive 13 studies
Mood Support
Impact
High effect
C- Ingredient FitB- PathwaysB+ EvidenceA+ Formulation Logic
Magnesium · 250 mg

Magnesium can help address low intake associated with apathy and depressed mood. The 250 mg per serving provides a meaningful mineral contribution, but extra mood benefit with adequate intake is not established. Trace lithium is also present; evidence for prescription lithium does not establish the same effects at this supplemental exposure.

How this product is rated for Mood Support

Ingredient fit57

Lithium, Magnesium provide the relevant connections. Their amounts make uneven contributions to the comparison.
Goal fit
The mood-related ingredients sit within a broader formula containing ingredients directed toward other health goals.
Dose adequacy
The included ingredients have known amounts, but several fall below their upper comparison references; this limits the amount-based contribution.

Pathways70

Magnesium supplies the main calming connection; the saved findings also include an inflammation-related route. These roles do not establish extra benefit with adequate intake.
Depth
Neural calming is the strongest connection in the saved findings; this describes ingredient roles rather than a demonstrated emotional effect.
Breadth
Two routes reach meaningful coverage, while other mood-related roles remain limited or unrepresented.

Evidence84

The leading evidence finding reflects the included ingredient references, while nutrient status and studied populations limit what those findings mean for everyday mood.
Evidence strength
Magnesium leads the included evidence finding; its supplied population and outcome limitations still govern expectations.
Studied preparation
The included ingredients meet the saved preparation comparison; this alone does not establish benefit in healthy adults.

Formulation logic100

The included ingredients meet the partner and minimum amount conditions, with no listed conflict triggered. These findings do not demonstrate added benefit from the combination.
Partner coverage
The included ingredients have no unmet partner requirement; this does not imply extra benefit from combining them.
Conflicts
None of the listed ingredient-conflict conditions was triggered by the supplied product facts.
Effective doses
All ingredients retained in this finding meet its minimum amount threshold, which is not a proven effective mood dose.
Study evidence
Lithium Supportive 197 studies
Magnesium Supportive 60 studies
Bone Health
Impact
High effect
C Ingredient FitC PathwaysA+ EvidenceA+ Formulation Logic
Magnesium · 250 mgBoron · 1 mg

Magnesium supports normal bone metabolism and may fill an intake gap. The 250 mg elemental serving receives partial amount recognition, providing the clearest supported role here. Boron also receives saved recognition for mineral-regulation processes, but small studies do not establish a routine bone-specific benefit or improved bone density. The very small potassium amount is not counted and does not establish equivalence to the potassium-citrate preparations used in research.

How this product is rated for Bone Health

Ingredient fit61

Magnesium and boron receive recognition, with partial amounts and other actives limiting focus.
Goal fit
Magnesium and boron receive recognition within a broader mineral formula.
Dose adequacy
Both counted ingredients receive partial amount recognition; potassium is too low to count.

Pathways65

Mineral supply and calcium-regulation processes are represented.
Depth
Bone mineral supply is the strongest area.
Breadth
Mineral supply and calcium regulation meet the coverage criterion.

Evidence95

Magnesium supplies the strongest saved evidence finding; both counted preparations are recognized.
Evidence strength
Magnesium provides the strongest saved evidence for nutritional intake-gap support.
Studied preparation
Both counted preparations are recognized; that does not establish a clinical bone benefit from boron.

Formulation logic100

Both counted ingredients meet the amount criterion without required missing partners or configured conflicts.
Partner coverage
Neither counted ingredient lacks a required partner.
Conflicts
No configured ingredient conflict was identified.
Effective doses
Magnesium and boron reach the criterion; potassium is outside the counted set.
Study evidence
Boron Supportive 5 studies
Magnesium Supportive 48 studies
Potassium Supportive 39 studies

Ingredients

IngredientAmount per servingScore
Calories
5 Calorie(s)
Total Carbohydrates
1 Gram(s)
Magnesium
250 mg 40
Chloride
650 mg 60
Sodium
5 mg
Potassium
3 mg
Sulfate
40 mg 42
Lithium
1.5 mg 60
Boron
1 mg 42
Gluten Free Adults 18–50 Vegan Kosher Dairy Free No Allergies Halal All Children Vegetarian
Report overview
Chloride · 650 mg OverallScore60
F Active Ingredient Quality & BioavailabilityA Dose, Safety & Label TransparencyB+ Value
Chloride is listed at a substantial 650 mg per serving, but its specific salt source remains unidentified in the saved facts. A whole-product serving costs about $0.56, giving a favorable price comparison without resolving the chemical source.
How this ingredient is rated

Active Ingredient Quality & Bioavailability20

The specific chloride salt is unresolved in the saved facts, limiting a comparison based on chemical source.
Chloride source quality
No specific chloride salt is identified in the saved facts, so source identity cannot be assessed further.

Dose, Safety & Label Transparency91

The 650 mg amount provides a substantial chloride amount. Amount disclosure is clear, while the complete salt source remains unresolved.
Chloride amount per serving
The serving provides 650 mg of chloride, a substantial chloride amount.
Amount and source disclosure
The individual chloride amount is given, but the complete specific salt source is not identified.

Value80

A whole-product serving costs about $0.56, making it favorably priced in the supplied comparison. That cost covers the complete formula rather than chloride alone.
Price per serving
About $0.56 per whole-product serving makes it favorably priced in the supplied comparison; the price is not allocated to chloride alone.
Sulfur · 40 mg OverallScore42
D- Active Ingredient Quality & BioavailabilityD- Dose, Safety & Label TransparencyD+ Value
Sulfur is represented by a declared 40 mg of sulfate per serving, with no separate elemental sulfur amount established. The sulfate quantity is clear, but it cannot be compared directly with an explicitly declared elemental sulfur amount.
How this ingredient is rated

Active Ingredient Quality & Bioavailability40

The saved facts do not resolve the specific sulfur source or mineral carrier, limiting a comparison of chemical forms.
Sulfur Source & Chemical Form
The specific sulfur source or mineral carrier is unresolved in the saved facts.

Dose, Safety & Label Transparency40

The 40 mg sulfate amount is disclosed, while elemental sulfur content remains unknown; the compound amount cannot be read as the same sulfur amount.
Elemental Sulfur Potency
Elemental sulfur content is unknown; the declared sulfate mass does not establish a sulfur dose.
Quantitative Complex Disclosure
The label explicitly quantifies 40 mg of sulfate per serving, providing compound disclosure without establishing elemental sulfur content.

Value50

The whole-product serving costs about $0.56. The serving price is relatively high and covers the full formula.
Price per Serving vs. Collection Median
About $0.56 per whole-product serving falls in a higher price bracket.
Lithium · 1.5 mg OverallScore60
F Active Ingredient Quality & BioavailabilityA+ Dose, Safety & Label TransparencyD- Value
Report alternatives

Sources

Published studies used for the product analysis and the top-ranked studies for each ingredient and goal.

  1. [Comparative study of the urinary excretion of boron, calcium, magnesium and phosphorus in postmenopausal women with and without osteoporosis].
    José Ramón V; Mora Mora M; Marino Alarcón O; Hernández G; Josefina Linares L; Urdaneta Romero H; Arévalo González E · Investigacion clinica · 2013
    Case-control study45 participantsBone Health forBoron
  2. Effect of dietary boron on mineral, estrogen, and testosterone metabolism in postmenopausal women.
    Nielsen FH; Hunt CD; Mullen LM; Hunt JR · FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 1987
    Single-arm trial12 participantsBone Health forBoron
  3. The relationship between boron and magnesium status and bone mineral density in the human: a review.
    Volpe SL; Taper LJ; Meacham S · Magnesium research · 1994
    Narrative reviewBone Health forBoron
  4. Effects of boron supplementation on bone mineral density and dietary, blood, and urinary calcium, phosphorus, magnesium, and boron in female athletes.
    Meacham SL; Taper LJ; Volpe SL · Environmental health perspectives · 1995
    Randomized trial28 participantsBone Health forBoron
  5. Metabolic responses of postmenopausal women to supplemental dietary boron and aluminum during usual and low magnesium intake: boron, calcium, and magnesium absorption and retention and blood mineral concentrations
    C D Hunt, J L Herbel, F H Nielsen · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · 1997
    Non-randomized trial11 participantsBone Health forBoron
  6. Association between Serum Magnesium and Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.
    Dominguez LJ; Veronese N; Ciriminna S; Pérez-Albela JL; Vásquez-López VF; Rodas-Regalado S; Di Bella G; Parisi A; Tagliaferri F; Barbagallo M · Nutrients · 2023
    Meta-analysis119,755 participants4 studies pooledBone Health forMagnesium
  7. Bioabsorbable Magnesium-Based Materials Potential and Safety in Bone Surgery: A Systematic Review.
    Hung CH; Kwok YC; Yip J; Wong HH; Leung YY · Craniomaxillofacial trauma & reconstruction · 2025
    Systematic review386 participants8 studies pooledBone Health forMagnesium
  8. Vascularized bone grafting fixed by biodegradable magnesium screw for treating osteonecrosis of the femoral head.
    Zhao D; Huang S; Lu F; Wang B; Yang L; Qin L; Yang K; Li Y; Li W; Wang W; Tian S; Zhang X; Gao W; Wang Z; Zhang Y; Xie X; Wang J; Li J · Biomaterials · 2016
    Randomized trial48 participantsBone Health forMagnesium
  9. An update on magnesium and bone health.
    Rondanelli M; Faliva MA; Tartara A; Gasparri C; Perna S; Infantino V; Riva A; Petrangolini G; Peroni G · Biometals : an international journal on the role of metal ions in biology, biochemistry, and medicine · 2022
    Narrative reviewBone Health forMagnesium
  10. Sex-specific differences in the association of magnesium intake with femoral neck bone mineral density among older adults.
    Wang B; Tan X; Yao X; Zhu Z · Endocrine connections · 2025
    Cross-sectional study1,343 participantsBone Health forMagnesium
  11. Effect of potassium citrate on bone density, microarchitecture, and fracture risk in healthy older adults without osteoporosis: a randomized controlled trial.
    Jehle S; Hulter HN; Krapf R · The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2013
    Randomized trial201 participantsBone Health forPotassium
  12. Long-term persistence of the urine calcium-lowering effect of potassium bicarbonate in postmenopausal women.
    Frassetto L; Morris RC; Sebastian A · The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2005
    Randomized trial170 participantsBone Health forPotassium
  13. Partial neutralization of the acidogenic Western diet with potassium citrate increases bone mass in postmenopausal women with osteopenia.
    Jehle S; Zanetti A; Muser J; Hulter HN; Krapf R · Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2007
    Randomized trial161 participantsBone Health forPotassium
  14. Potassium citrate supplementation results in sustained improvement in calcium balance in older men and women.
    Moseley KF; Weaver CM; Appel L; Sebastian A; Sellmeyer DE · Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2013
    Randomized trial52 participantsBone Health forPotassium
  15. Effects of potassium chloride and potassium bicarbonate on endothelial function, cardiovascular risk factors, and bone turnover in mild hypertensives.
    He FJ; Marciniak M; Carney C; Markandu ND; Anand V; Fraser WD; Dalton RN; Kaski JC; MacGregor GA · Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2010
    Randomized trial42 participantsBone Health forPotassium
  16. Circulating and dietary magnesium and risk of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies.
    Del Gobbo LC; Imamura F; Wu JH; de Oliveira Otto MC; Chiuve SE; Mozaffarian D · The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2013
    Meta-analysis313,041 participants16 studies pooledCardiovascular Support forMagnesium
  17. Magnesium and the risk of cardiovascular events: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies.
    Qu X; Jin F; Hao Y; Li H; Tang T; Wang H; Yan W; Dai K · PloS one · 2013
    Meta-analysis532,979 participants19 studies pooledCardiovascular Support forMagnesium
  18. Quantitative Association Between Serum/Dietary Magnesium and Cardiovascular Disease/Coronary Heart Disease Risk: A Dose-Response Meta-analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies.
    Zhao L; Hu M; Yang L; Xu H; Song W; Qian Y; Zhao M · Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology · 2020
    Meta-analysis544,581 participants18 studies pooledCardiovascular Support Heart Health forMagnesium
  19. Comparative Efficacy of Nutraceuticals on Endothelial Function: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
    Norouzzadeh M; Rashedi MH; Mahdavi-Mazdeh G; Kosari A; Shahinfar H · Current atherosclerosis reports · 2026
    Meta-analysisCardiovascular Support Heart Health forMagnesium
  20. Serum magnesium, mortality, and cardiovascular disease in chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Xiong J; He T; Wang M; Nie L; Zhang Y; Wang Y; Huang Y; Feng B; Zhang J; Zhao J · Journal of nephrology · 2020
    Meta-analysis200,934 participants20 studies pooledCardiovascular Support forMagnesium