 Vitacost | $ 35.99 | |
 Walmart | $ 35.99 | |
 Pure Formulas | $ 35.99 | |
 Amazon | $ 35.99 | |
 iHerb | $ 21.59 |
A 10 mg iron serving may suit someone who needs a moderate amount rather than a high-dose tablet. The liquid format can make serving adjustments easier, but the unknown iron form prevents a clear judgment about absorption and digestive tolerance.
Acerola, elderberry, sea buckthorn, beet, and other extracts add a food-based profile. Their amounts are small, no vitamin C yield is stated, and the 2.4 g proprietary extract blend hides most ingredient-level contributions.
The smaller format provides weak serving value for the disclosed iron amount. The formula does not disclose meaningful folate or vitamin B12 support, so it should not be treated as a complete blood-building product. It fits users with a confirmed need for moderate liquid iron better than shoppers seeking elderberry or acerola.
The liquid format is practical, but the iron compound and most botanical extract strengths are unspecified, and the 10 mg iron amount is modest for targeted repletion, while elderberry and acerola appear only as small supporting ingredients. The iron amount is not excessive, but use is poorly suited to people without a confirmed need, while iron with acerola and botanical ingredients fits a gentle liquid tonic, but supporting vitamin C is not quantified.
.Iron and individual botanicals have amounts, but the larger proprietary extract blend hides its components, and a proprietary blend hides the amounts of its individual components. Serving count is supplied, but complete daily-use directions are not provided, while inactive ingredients and excipients are not included in the supplied label details.
.The supplied average rating is favorable but below the strongest products in this group, and substantial review volume gives the average rating useful credibility. Specific review themes are unavailable, so repeated negatives and real-world fit remain uncertain.
.Major dose or disclosure problems make the formula difficult to justify on quality alone, and the high serving cost weakens value relative to similar formulas. Several small botanical extracts add breadth without a clearly quantified contribution to iron support, while dose, disclosure, or serving-value limitations make it less competitive than similar products.
.| Ingredient | Amount per serving |
|---|---|
Calories | 10 Calorie(s) |
Total Carbohydrates | 2 Gram(s) |
Iron | 10 mg |
Sea Buckthorn | 100 mg |
organic Star Anise (Illicium verum) pods extract | 90 mg |
organic Black Elderberry extract | 49 mg |
Acerola fruit extract | 40 mg |
organic Rice Bran extract | 40 mg |
organic Beet | 20 mg |
Proprietary Extract Blend | 2.4 Gram(s) |
The liquid format may be easier to adjust and gentler to take, but the iron compound is not identified, leaving its absorption quality uncertain. The serving supplies less iron than the collection target and lacks clearly quantified vitamin C, folate, or vitamin B12 for absorption and red blood cell support. Its cost per serving is high despite the modest dose.
Acerola appears only as a small supporting ingredient, so the serving is poorly suited to someone seeking a meaningful acerola dose. The fruit extract avoids disclosed synthetic vitamin C, but its vitamin C yield and concentration are not stated. Its role in a broader iron and botanical formula also makes the cost difficult to judge as a dedicated acerola supplement.
The elderberry extract is clearly weighed but falls below the amount typically used for meaningful botanical support. Its concentration, active markers, species, and plant part are not disclosed, leaving ingredient quality uncertain. The low active amount also makes its value weak despite clear weight reporting.
