Nutrient quality
The protein amount is meaningful and the macronutrient profile is practical. Incomplete whey-source detail and weak heart-specific coverage are the main limitations.
.| $ 114.99 | ||
Vitacost | $ 84.99 |
The 24 g protein serving fits people looking to increase daily protein without a large carbohydrate or fat load. Calcium and potassium add some nutritional value, while the 35 mg cholesterol amount may matter to shoppers tracking dietary cholesterol.
Potassium at 220 mg contributes to normal electrolyte intake but is too modest to make the powder a heart-focused choice.
The nutrition amounts are easy to assess, but the supplied label does not identify the whey type, mineral forms, or other ingredients. The large serving count supports practical value for regular protein use, though not for targeted potassium or sodium supplementation.
The protein amount is meaningful and the macronutrient profile is practical. Incomplete whey-source detail and weak heart-specific coverage are the main limitations.
.Core nutrition totals are clear enough for basic comparison. Missing complete ingredients, use directions, and detailed protein or blend composition leave notable gaps.
.Aggregate satisfaction data are favorable. Specific firsthand comments were not supplied, leaving repeated complaints and purpose fit uncertain.
.The protein amount provides fair value for the category. Cost and formulation trade-offs keep it from standing out.
.| Ingredient | Amount per serving |
|---|---|
Calories | 120 Calorie(s) |
Total Fat | 1 Gram(s) |
Cholesterol | 35 mg |
Sodium | 105 mg |
Total Carbohydrates | 3 Gram(s) |
Protein | 24 Gram(s) |
Calcium | 130 mg |
Iron | 0.7 mg |
Potassium | 220 mg |
The sodium amount is too low for meaningful sweat replacement and its source is not identified. Potassium is clearly quantified but lacks a named form, while magnesium and buffering support are absent. The moderate serving cost buys a substantial whey serving rather than a well-developed electrolyte formula.
The 220 mg potassium serving provides a moderate amount but remains below the collection median. The chemical form is not identified, so absorption quality and metabolic function cannot be judged. The dose is presented clearly, although the serving cost offers only middling value for potassium alone.
Published studies used for the product analysis and the top-ranked studies for each ingredient and goal.