$47.99 $1.59 per serving
Product analysis
Prostate Health combines minerals and plant ingredients for prostate support. The high cost for several key ingredients and the less favorable zinc form may make it a less appealing purchase.
AI assessment of the formula, label and price. How scoring works
Nutrient Quality45
Mineral form quality is mixed, with favorable selenium and copper forms alongside less favorable zinc oxide. Several plant ingredient forms are unspecified, making their quality harder to compare.
Ingredient Transparency81
All listed amounts are disclosed, so serving quantities can be compared. Only some forms are identified, leaving several plant ingredients less clearly described.
Value For Money21
The serving is costly for several of its minerals and plant ingredients. Uncertain value for saw palmetto and beta sitosterol does not establish a compensating price advantage.
Customer Satisfaction71
Customers generally respond very positively, but the review pool is small. The feedback gives an early view of satisfaction without confirming prostate-related benefits.
Product Focus61
The formula appears reasonably aligned with its intended purpose while spanning a broad range of goals. That breadth makes it less specialized, although no ingredient is confirmed to be unnecessary.
- Format
Softgel - Container
- 90 Softgel(s)
- Per serving
- $1.59
- Customer rating
- 4.7 · 65 ratings
Goals
Impact
High effect
Zinc · 30 mg
Zinc has the clearest role here, helping maintain testosterone when zinc intake is low. Selenium hormone findings concern selected infertility populations, and nettle's proposed androgen effects come from laboratory work rather than demonstrated oral human benefit. Copper is present, so the saved high-zinc-without-copper concern does not apply.
How this product is rated for Testosterone Support
Ingredient fit70
The goal connection comes from the relevant declared nutrients and their amounts, with the scientific limitations described for each ingredient.
Goal fit
The connection rests on the relevant declared nutrients; ingredients serving other purposes do not add a demonstrated testosterone benefit.
Dose adequacy
The declared amounts support the saved comparison to varying degrees; meeting its thresholds does not establish a proven hormone benefit.
Pathways18
The saved findings favor testosterone production. These ingredient associations do not establish a hormone change in the user.
Depth
The saved findings show limited direct hormone-pathway coverage beyond nutrient sufficiency.
Breadth
None of the hormone pathways meets the saved coverage threshold.
Evidence90
Zinc supplies the strongest relevant evidence through correction of low intake. Other counted ingredients have more limited or context-dependent hormone findings.
Evidence strength
Zinc provides the strongest relevant evidence here, specifically for correcting low zinc intake rather than increasing testosterone above adequacy.
Studied preparation
Zinc and selenium preparations are accepted in the saved comparison; nettle is not identified as a studied preparation for this purpose.
Formulation logic100
No required partner or configured conflict was found. Counted ingredient amounts meet the saved inclusion threshold, without proving an extra benefit from the formula.
Partner coverage
No required partner is missing for the counted ingredients; this does not establish an added benefit from combining them.
Conflicts
Copper is present, so the high-zinc-without-copper concern does not apply; no other configured conflict was found.
Effective doses
All counted ingredients meet the saved amount inclusion threshold; this is a comparison threshold rather than a proven effective hormone dose.
Stinging Nettle Not classified
No linked studies yet.
Impact
High effect
Selenium · 200 mcgZinc · 30 mg
Zinc contributes to normal immune function, while selenium supports antioxidant enzymes. They can help fill low intakes, but additional benefits are not established when intake is adequate. Copper is also present, so the saved findings do not flag the high zinc without copper concern. The supported general health contribution centres on these nutrients despite the broader formula.
How this product is rated for Everyday Health
Ingredient fit67
Zinc and selenium provide the relevant nutritional contributions within a broader formula. The main contributing nutrient amounts reach the saved comparison range; this does not establish extra benefit above adequate intake.
Goal fit
Zinc and selenium provide the relevant nutritional contributions within a broader formula.
Dose adequacy
The main contributing nutrient amounts reach the saved comparison range; this does not establish extra benefit above adequate intake.
Pathways60
The supported coverage includes antioxidant and immune defence.
Depth
The strongest contribution centres on antioxidant and immune defence.
Breadth
The supported coverage includes antioxidant and immune defence.
Evidence82
Selenium provides the strongest supported contribution at the supplied amount. The relevant preparations were accepted, without establishing superiority of a particular form.
Evidence strength
Selenium provides the strongest supported contribution at the supplied amount, within the limits of its nutritional role.
Studied preparation
The relevant preparations were accepted in the supplied findings; this does not establish a special benefit from their forms.
Formulation logic100
The included nutrient contributions meet the saved amount criterion; this is not proof of additional health benefit.
Partner coverage
The included contributions do not have an unmet required ingredient partner.
Conflicts
No listed ingredient conflict was identified in the supplied findings.
Effective doses
The included nutrient contributions meet the saved amount criterion; this is not proof of additional health benefit.
Impact
Highest effect
Zinc · 30 mg
Zinc helps address diffuse shedding when zinc intake is deficient; it does not establish extra regrowth when zinc needs are met. Saw palmetto has limited hair-count findings for specific extracts in selected thinning-hair or androgenetic-alopecia groups. The generic material here does not establish equivalence with those preparations, and its larger amount does not establish additional benefit.
How this product is rated for Hair Health
Ingredient fit82
The relevant ingredient amounts support the saved comparison, with focus reduced where the product covers many other goals.
Goal fit
The relevant ingredients sit within a broader formula with ingredients aimed at other goals.
Dose adequacy
The declared quantities provide the saved amount comparison; meeting its endpoints does not establish hair regrowth or a suitable individual regimen.
Pathways55
Keratin and copper provide the hair-fibre connection, but no route reaches the saved coverage threshold.
Depth
Antioxidant-related activity provides the strongest represented route; plausible follicle protection does not itself demonstrate hair regrowth.
Breadth
Only the antioxidant-related route reaches the saved coverage threshold, leaving narrow coverage of the other hair routes.
Evidence93
Zinc leads the evidence comparison. Practical expectations remain limited by deficiency conditions, clinical populations and preparation-specific findings.
Evidence strength
Zinc leads the supplied evidence comparison, with practical hair relevance chiefly in correcting zinc deficiency.
Studied preparation
Saw Palmetto does not match the studied-preparation comparison; retained fallback treatment does not establish equivalent hair outcomes.
Formulation logic100
No missing required partner or listed ingredient conflict limits the formula. The counted ingredients meet the minimum amount comparison.
Partner coverage
No missing required partner limits the counted ingredients; this does not establish extra benefit from combining them.
Conflicts
No combination matched the supplied ingredient conflict checks.
Effective doses
The counted ingredients meet the saved minimum amount comparison, which does not establish a clinically effective hair dose.
Impact
Highest effect
Zinc · 30 mgSelenium · 200 mcg
Zinc and selenium contribute to normal immune function, while copper can help address low intake that impairs immune-cell activity. All three reach the saved full amount comparison. Their nutritional roles do not establish stronger immunity or infection prevention when intake is adequate. Zinc oxide and the disclosed selenium and copper forms receive no assumed clinical advantage or disadvantage.
How this product is rated for Immunity
Ingredient fit72
Zinc, selenium and copper contribute with full amount coverage.
Goal fit
Other actives and links to other goals reduce focus on these immune nutrients.
Dose adequacy
All three counted nutrients reach full amount coverage without establishing added benefit above adequate intake.
Pathways100
Lymphocyte regulation is the strongest covered category, alongside innate cells and oxidative balance.
Depth
Lymphocyte function and immune regulation reaches full coverage.
Breadth
Three categories meet the threshold: innate immune cells, lymphocyte regulation, and oxidative and inflammatory balance.
Evidence100
Zinc leads the evidence finding for normal nutrient-supported immune function.
Evidence strength
Zinc provides the leading evidence contribution; acute lozenge findings do not transfer to an ordinary single serving.
Studied preparation
All counted nutrient declarations receive full preparation recognition without form superiority.
Formulation logic100
Partner checks are satisfied and no configured conflict was found.
Partner coverage
No counted nutrient lacks a required partner.
Conflicts
No configured ingredient conflict was matched.
Effective doses
All three counted nutrients pass the minimum amount threshold.
Impact
Highest effect
Zinc · 30 mgCopper · 2 mgSelenium · 200 mcgLycopene · 6 mg
Zinc helps skin repair when intake is low, and copper is needed for collagen and elastin cross-linking. These normal functions do not establish extra cosmetic improvement with adequate nutrition. Lycopene has modest, mixed support for selected UV-related changes; 6 mg per serving is below the cited study exposures. Selenium’s antioxidant-enzyme role does not establish routine skin improvement.
How this product is rated for Skin Health
Ingredient fit72
The formula’s connection to skin health depends on its relevant ingredients and how clearly their amounts are established.
Goal fit
Skin-related ingredients share this formula with ingredients aimed at other purposes, making its skin focus less concentrated.
Dose adequacy
The recognized amounts provide uneven support against the saved comparison amounts; lower or unresolved quantities limit interpretation.
Pathways76
The saved findings recognize selected skin pathways, with scientific limitations on how those findings translate to visible changes.
Depth
The strongest recorded area is dermal structure, though recorded coverage does not establish a clinical benefit.
Breadth
The saved findings span dermal structure and UV-related antioxidant activity, with limited barrier-lipid support and no water-binding coverage.
Evidence89
The saved evidence findings retain ingredient recognition, while the scientific context limits claims for routine cosmetic improvement.
Evidence strength
Copper leads the recognized evidence findings; the supplied context limits claims to the relevant population, preparation and outcome.
Studied preparation
The saved findings accept the recognized preparation declarations, but this does not extend the studies to untested cosmetic outcomes.
Formulation logic100
The saved findings show no missing required partner or recorded conflict; amount and preparation limits still matter.
Partner coverage
No missing required partner limited the recognized ingredients; this does not establish added benefit from combining them.
Conflicts
No ingredient conflict was recorded in the supplied findings; this is not a comprehensive safety assessment.
Effective doses
All recognized ingredients meet the saved minimum amount threshold; that threshold is not a proven effective skin dose.
Impact
High effect
Zinc can help with inflammation associated with inadequate zinc intake, while selenium supports antioxidant enzymes. Lycopene's antioxidant role does not establish broad clinical anti-inflammatory benefit. Stinging nettle findings do not transfer reliably between root and leaf preparations, so its presence does not establish routine systemic benefit.
How this product is rated for Inflammation
Ingredient fit63
Relevant ingredients share the formula with broader uses, giving it a mixed focus on inflammation. The counted amounts partly match the saved comparison ranges.
Goal fit
Relevant ingredients share the formula with broader uses, giving it a mixed focus on inflammation.
Dose adequacy
The counted amounts partly match the saved comparison ranges.
Pathways41
The strongest saved finding concerns oxidative stress, which does not itself establish clinical inflammation relief. Only oxidative stress reaches the saved coverage threshold.
Depth
The strongest saved finding concerns oxidative stress, which does not itself establish clinical inflammation relief.
Breadth
Only oxidative stress reaches the saved coverage threshold.
Evidence68
Lycopene leads the saved evidence finding, but the scientific context limits claims of routine clinical benefit. Recognized preparation matching does not remove those limitations.
Evidence strength
Lycopene leads the saved evidence finding, but the scientific context limits claims of routine clinical benefit.
Studied preparation
The counted preparations match those recognized in the saved findings; the supplied population and outcome limitations still apply.
Formulation logic100
Counted ingredients meet the saved amount threshold and partner requirements, with no configured conflict identified. These findings do not establish synergy or comprehensive safety.
Partner coverage
The counted ingredients work independently or have their required partner in the saved findings.
Conflicts
No configured ingredient conflict was identified; this does not assess every possible interaction.
Effective doses
All counted ingredients clear the saved amount threshold, a comparison rule rather than a proven effective dose.
Ingredients
| Ingredient | Amount per serving | Score |
|---|---|---|
Calories | 20 Calorie(s) | |
Total Fat | 2 Gram(s) | |
Zinc (Zinc Oxide) | 30 mg | |
Selenium (L-Selenomethionine) | 200 mcg | |
Copper (Copper Citrate) | 2 mg | |
Cranberry powder | 500 mg | |
Saw Palmetto extract | 320 mg | |
Stinging Nettle extract | 300 mg | |
Beta-Sitosterol (Vegetable Oil) | 130 mg | |
Lycopene (Tomato) | 6 mg |
Selenium (L-Selenomethionine) · 200 mcg OverallScore82
A serving provides 200 mcg of selenium as L-selenomethionine. The whole-product serving costs about $1.60.
How this ingredient is rated
Active Ingredient Quality & Bioavailability100
The specified form is L-selenomethionine, identifying the L isomer.
Selenium Chemical Form
The named selenium form is L-selenomethionine.
Form Transparency & Isomer Specificity
L-selenomethionine identifies the specific L form.
Dose, Safety & Label Transparency100
The serving provides 200 mcg of selenium. The serving remains below the evaluated upper limit, though selenium from other sources also counts.
Dosage Efficacy Sweet Spot
The serving provides 200 mcg of selenium.
Safety Margin & UL Adherence
The 200 mcg per serving is below the evaluated upper limit, leaving room for selenium from food and other sources.
Value10
At the listed serving price, the equivalent of 200 mcg of selenium costs about $1.60 for the whole product.
Price per 200 mcg Serving
At the listed serving price, the equivalent of 200 mcg of selenium costs about $1.60 for the whole product.
Copper (Copper Citrate) · 2 mg OverallScore76
Each serving provides 2 mg of copper as copper citrate, a well-absorbed form. The 30 mg of zinc gives a favorable zinc-to-copper balance, though the whole-product serving costs about $1.60.
How this ingredient is rated
Active Ingredient Quality & Bioavailability79
Copper Citrate is a well-absorbed organic form. The copper amount and source are stated on the label.
Copper Form Bioavailability
Copper Citrate is a well-absorbed organic form.
Elemental Copper Labeling Clarity
The copper row states 2 mg of copper and names copper citrate as its source.
Dose, Safety & Label Transparency100
Each serving provides 2 mg of copper. The serving pairs 30 mg of zinc with 2 mg of copper, a balance the evaluation favors.
Copper Dosage Safety & Efficacy
Each serving provides 2 mg of copper, an amount the evaluation views favorably.
Zinc-to-Copper Balance
The serving pairs 30 mg of zinc with 2 mg of copper, a balance the evaluation favors.
Value20
At about $1.60 per whole-product serving, the price is high for a copper comparison. The serving also contains other ingredients.
Price Per Serving Efficiency
A whole-product serving costs about $1.60; that price covers the full product, including its 2 mg of copper.
Lycopene (Tomato) · 6 mg OverallScore70
The declared lycopene amount is 6 mg per serving. The whole-product price corresponds to about $2.67 per 10 mg of lycopene, a relatively high cost on this basis.
How this ingredient is rated
Composition and Label Disclosure
No separate assessment of lycopene quality or absorption is included.
Composition and Label Disclosure100
The declared lycopene amount is 6 mg per serving.
Declared Active Lycopene Amount
The declared lycopene amount is 6 mg per serving.
Commercial Price and Usability10
The whole-product price corresponds to about $2.67 per 10 mg of lycopene, a relatively high cost on this basis.
Whole-Product Cost per 10 mg Declared Active Lycopene
The whole-product price corresponds to about $2.67 per 10 mg of lycopene, a relatively high cost on this basis.
Alternative products
Report alternatives
Sources
Published studies used for the product analysis and the top-ranked studies for each ingredient and goal.
- The Association between Dietary and Circulating Copper Levels and Osteoporosis: a Scoping Review.
- Association between dietary copper, iron, zinc, selenium intake and osteopenia or osteoporosis in elderly hypertensive patients: a retrospective cohort study.
- Associations of dietary copper intake with total bone mineral density and lumbar spine bone mineral density in American adults.
- The association between dietary mineral intake and bone mineral density: a cross-sectional study.
- Association between dietary copper intake and bone mineral density in children and adolescents aged 8-19 years: A cross-sectional study.
- Increased incidence of fractures in middle-aged and elderly men with low intakes of phosphorus and zinc.
- Zinc Supplementation Increases Procollagen Type 1 Amino-Terminal Propeptide in Premenarcheal Girls: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
- Randomized controlled trial of prenatal zinc supplementation and fetal bone growth.
- The effects of zinc supplementation on serum zinc, alkaline phosphatase activity and fracture healing of bones.
- Is Zinc an Important Trace Element on Bone-Related Diseases and Complications? A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review from Serum Level, Dietary Intake, and Supplementation Aspects.
- Effects of lycopene intake on HDL-cholesterol and triglyceride levels: A systematic review with meta-analysis.
- Improvement of vascular endothelial function by intake of lycopene-rich tomato juice in healthy adults: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group comparative study.
- Tomato and lycopene supplementation and cardiovascular risk factors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
- Lycopene and tomato and risk of cardiovascular diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiological evidence.
- Lycopene and risk of cardiovascular diseases: A meta-analysis of observational studies.
- Effect of supplementation with high-selenium yeast on plasma lipids: a randomized trial.
- Association of selenium and cadmium with heart failure and mortality based on the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.
- Higher serum selenium concentration is associated with lower risk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality among individuals with chronic kidney disease: A population-based cohort study of NHANES.
- Selenium status in the body and cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
- Associations of selenium status with all-cause and cause-specific mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.