Nutrient quality
The protein amount is meaningful and the macronutrient profile is practical. Incomplete whey-source detail and weak heart-specific coverage are the main limitations.
. Vitacost | $ 109.99 | |
| $ 118.44 |
The 24 g protein serving is a practical standard amount for routine shakes. Its 4 g carbohydrate and 2 g fat amounts are modest, but the exact whey form is not identified.
Potassium at 190 mg is too small to make a meaningful targeted contribution. Sodium is also low for athletic replenishment, and the formula does not include a dedicated heart-support ingredient.
The supplied nutrition panel is clear and the package contains many servings. Mineral sources, sweeteners, flavors, and the complete ingredient list are omitted, preventing a fuller assessment of quality and tolerance.
The protein amount is meaningful and the macronutrient profile is practical. Incomplete whey-source detail and weak heart-specific coverage are the main limitations.
.Core nutrition totals are clear enough for basic comparison. Missing complete ingredients, use directions, and detailed protein or blend composition leave notable gaps.
.Aggregate satisfaction data are favorable. Specific firsthand comments were not supplied, leaving repeated complaints and purpose fit uncertain.
.The protein amount provides fair value for the category. Cost and formulation trade-offs keep it from standing out.
.| Ingredient | Amount per serving |
|---|---|
Calories | 130 Calorie(s) |
Total Fat | 2 Gram(s) |
Cholesterol | 45 mg |
Total Carbohydrates | 4 Gram(s) |
Protein | 24 Gram(s) |
Calcium | 130 mg |
Iron | 0 mg |
Sodium | 150 mg |
Potassium | 190 mg |
The 150 mg sodium serving is too low for typical athletic replenishment despite a separately listed potassium amount. Mineral source forms and trace-mineral support are not disclosed, while the flavored protein format has moderate carbohydrate content. The higher serving cost mainly reflects the protein content, so its value is more reasonable as a protein powder than as an electrolyte source.
The potassium source is not identified, so its absorption quality cannot be judged. The 190 mg amount provides a moderate dose but remains below the collection median. The serving price is relatively modest, yet the limited potassium delivery makes it a middling choice for potassium-focused use.
Published studies used for the product analysis and the top-ranked studies for each ingredient and goal.