Nutrient quality
Complementary plant sources and useful total protein amounts support general nutrition. Hidden source proportions, conflicting panels, substantial sodium, and weak mental-focus relevance limit formula quality.
. Amazon | $ 26.49 | |
| $ 26.97 | ||
Vitacost | $ 29.65 | |
| $ 26.97 |
The vanilla blend lists pea, hemp, and goji sources and provides a substantial amount of protein. Its low carbohydrate profile suits users who want a focused shake.
Proprietary source amounts are not disclosed, and the supplied data contain two conflicting nutrition sets. That makes it difficult to judge protein balance, sodium intake, and the applicable iron amount.
The short supply produces weak value compared with simpler plant isolates. High aggregate review volume does not resolve the missing formulation details.
Complementary plant sources and useful total protein amounts support general nutrition. Hidden source proportions, conflicting panels, substantial sodium, and weak mental-focus relevance limit formula quality.
.Named plant sources offer some context, but their proportions are hidden inside a proprietary blend. Conflicting panels, missing directions, and absent non-active ingredients make the label difficult to assess.
.The aggregate rating is favorable, but it provides no specific experience evidence. The very large review count gives the aggregate signal a strong volume base, while no detailed feedback is supplied to assess taste, mixability, tolerance, or recurring complaints.
.Useful total protein adds some value, but hidden proportions and conflicting panels weaken confidence in what is delivered. A very high relative serving cost and short supply make the product poorly competitive.
.| Ingredient | Amount per serving |
|---|---|
Calories | 150 Calorie(s) |
Total Fat | 3 Gram(s) |
Total Carbohydrates | 3 Gram(s) |
Protein | 27 Gram(s) |
Calcium | 39 mg |
Iron | 8 mg |
Sodium | 528 mg |
Proprietary Protein Blend (organic Goji, organic Hemp Protein, organic Pea Protein) | 0 NP |
The sodium amount is well suited to typical athletic replenishment, but its source form is not disclosed. No supporting potassium or magnesium form strengthens the electrolyte profile. The formula's protein content helps explain its higher serving cost, while the carbohydrate load remains low.
Iron is a minor nutrient contribution rather than an effective standalone dose. The chemical form is not disclosed, and no qualifying absorption cofactors are present. The convenient scoop does not offset poor iron-focused value.