Nutrient quality
Whey isolate provides a substantial amount of complete protein in a lean format. The implausible cholesterol entry and unnamed mineral forms reduce safety and form confidence.
| $ 59.99 | ||
| $ 59.99 |
The 25 g isolate serving is useful for convenient protein intake and muscle maintenance. Carbohydrate remains low, although a complete fat entry was not supplied in the product facts.
Potassium and magnesium contribute only small food-level amounts and do not make the powder cardiovascular focused. Sodium should be counted in a restricted diet, while no ingredient directly addresses lipids or vascular tone.
The listed cholesterol unit is implausible and needs confirmation on the package. Flavoring and non-active ingredients are also incomplete, making the formula harder to evaluate for sweeteners and tolerance.
Whey isolate provides a substantial amount of complete protein in a lean format. The implausible cholesterol entry and unnamed mineral forms reduce safety and form confidence.
The whey source and main nutrient amounts are disclosed without a hidden protein blend. The cholesterol unit, mineral forms, directions, and full non-active ingredient list remain unclear.
The aggregate rating is favorable but the response base is modest. No review text is supplied, so repeated complaints and specific product experiences cannot be verified.
The isolate format supports ingredient quality and supplies meaningful protein. A relatively high ongoing cost and serious label ambiguity weaken value.
| Ingredient | Amount per serving |
|---|---|
Calories | 110 Calorie(s) |
Cholesterol | 5 Gram(s) |
Total Carbohydrates | 2 Gram(s) |
Protein | 25 Gram(s) |
Calcium | 139 mg |
Phosphorus | 63 mg |
Magnesium | 22 mg |
Sodium | 135 mg |
Potassium | 160 mg |
Whey Protein isolate (Sunflower Lecithin) | 28.74 Gram(s) |
The sodium amount is too low to replace substantial sweat losses during intense activity. Source quality and supporting-electrolyte absorption remain uncertain because their chemical forms are incomplete. The supplied data show no clear additive concern, while cost efficiency is reasonable for the broader formula.
The serving offers a moderate potassium amount, but the whey-derived chemical form is not identified. The dietary label likely reports elemental potassium without confirming that detail. A cost above the collection norm makes it a weak choice when potassium is the priority.
The label states an elemental phosphorus amount but does not name its source compound, leaving its bone relevance uncertain. The 63 mg serving is likely incidental rather than a targeted phosphorus dose, although one scoop is practical. Cost per serving is high compared with the collection benchmark, weakening value for phosphorus-focused use.
Published studies used for the product analysis and the top-ranked studies for each ingredient and goal.