One Daily Men's Health with Lycopene

One Daily Men's Health with Lycopene

21st Century4.7 (31,156 ratings)
Format:Tablet Quantity: 100 Tablet(s) · 100 servings
Goals
$6.99 $0.06 per serving

About this product

Broad nutritional coverage is the main appeal, especially when daily food intake leaves gaps. B vitamins support normal energy metabolism, while 15 mg zinc, 110 mcg selenium and vitamin D3 contribute to normal immune and bone nutrition. Extra intake does not establish better energy or immune function once nutritional needs are met.

The mineral forms are a meaningful compromise behind the low daily cost. Zinc oxide and copper oxide are less favorable absorption choices, and chromium chloride also has limited absorption potential. Amounts are disclosed, but missing folate, biotin and lycopene forms and unclear proportions within the vitamin A and calcium mixtures leave some details unresolved.

The formula fits general maintenance better than targeted bone, hair or hormone support. Calcium at 210 mg provides only part of daily calcium needs, and 75 mcg biotin does not establish stronger nails or hair growth. Zinc's relevance to testosterone depends on low zinc intake, while the small lycopene addition offers little basis for a separate skin-focused benefit.

Who is it for
  • Adult men with gaps across several dietary nutrients
  • Budget-conscious buyers seeking general nutritional maintenance
Best for
  • Broad daily nutrient coverage when food intake is insufficient
  • Supplementing modest amounts of bone-related nutrients alongside dietary sources

Pros

  • B vitamins cover several normal energy-producing functions
  • Clearly stated zinc and copper amounts make intake easier to track
  • Vitamin D3 and magnesium add bone-related nutritional support
  • Low daily cost for the trace-mineral amounts supplied

Cons

  • Zinc oxide, copper oxide and chromium chloride limit the mineral mix's appeal
  • Calcium is modest for someone seeking focused calcium support
  • Some ingredient forms and mixture proportions are undisclosed
  • Hair, nail and hormone benefits remain dependent on nutritional need

Warnings

  • Avoid stacking extra vitamin A or selenium without checking total intake; excessive amounts can worsen hair shedding.

Product analysis

57 out of 100

One Daily Men's Health with Lycopene can help fill nutritional gaps relevant to normal immune and bone functions at a low serving cost. Several mineral forms are less favorable, limiting the appeal of the low price.

AI assessment of the formula, label and price. How scoring works

Nutrient Quality32

Mineral forms are a weakness, particularly the zinc and copper sources. Other nutrient-form comparisons remain uncertain, so the broad nutrient list does not establish an absorption advantage.

Ingredient Transparency76

Listed amounts and most forms are disclosed, making basic serving comparisons easier. Some forms and mixture proportions remain unspecified, leaving parts of the composition less clear.

Value For Money58

The serving price compares favorably for several minerals. Uncertain vitamin and lycopene value limits a firm conclusion for every part of the formula.

Customer Satisfaction92

Customer ratings are very positive across a particularly large number of reviews. The broad feedback supports satisfaction without proving wider health benefits.

Product Focus50

The main purpose is filling nutrient gaps relevant to normal immune, bone and metabolic functions. Its broad ingredient list does not establish extra hair growth, faster metabolism or higher testosterone when needs are already met.

Format
Tablet
Container
100 Tablet(s)
Per serving
$0.06
Customer rating
4.7 · 31,156 ratings
Report analysis

Goals

Everyday Health
Impact
Highest effect
B+ Ingredient FitA+ PathwaysA- EvidenceA+ Formulation Logic
Folate · 667 mcg DFEVitamin B12 · 18 mcgVitamin D · 17.5 mcgMagnesium · 140 mgVitamin K · 20 mcgSelenium · 110 mcgZinc · 15 mgVitamin C · 60 mg

The B vitamins provide nutritional building blocks for normal metabolism, with folate contributing to blood formation. Magnesium adds a contribution toward mineral needs. These contributions concern nutrient availability when intake is low; larger amounts and special forms do not establish added health benefits when intake is adequate.

How this product is rated for Everyday Health

Ingredient fit81

Vitamin B1 (Thiamin), Vitamin B2 (Riboflavin), Vitamin B3 (Niacin) provide the recorded nutritional connection. The amounts match those references unevenly.
Goal fit
The formula includes relevant nutrients alongside ingredients serving other purposes, giving it a broader focus.
Dose adequacy
Amounts vary in how fully they match the nutritional comparison references; unresolved quantities cannot establish a contribution.

Pathways100

The strongest connection is to energy metabolism cofactors. Recorded coverage also depends on the amounts available for each function.
Depth
The strongest recorded coverage concerns energy metabolism cofactors, reflecting ingredient availability rather than a measured health improvement.
Breadth
The recorded coverage includes energy metabolism cofactors, one-carbon metabolism and blood formation, antioxidant and immune defence.

Evidence86

Magnesium anchors the recorded evidence finding. Benefits remain conditional on nutritional need rather than proving improved general health in adequately nourished adults.
Evidence strength
Magnesium provides the strongest recorded evidence finding; the supplied context supports conditional nutritional usefulness rather than broad disease prevention.
Studied preparation
The counted preparations match those recognized in the saved findings, without establishing that any chemical form or delivery method is superior.

Formulation logic100

No missing partners or configured conflicts were identified. The counted amounts meet the minimum comparison threshold.
Partner coverage
No required ingredient partner is missing from the counted contributions; this does not imply extra benefit from combining nutrients.
Conflicts
No configured ingredient conflict was identified in the supplied findings.
Effective doses
All counted ingredients meet the comparison’s amount threshold; that threshold is not a proven clinical dose.
Study evidence
Folate Supportive 80 studies
Magnesium Supportive 114 studies
Selenium Supportive 70 studies
Vitamin C Supportive 56 studies
Vitamin D Supportive 115 studies
Vitamin K Supportive 34 studies
Zinc Supportive 60 studies
Impact
High effect
C Ingredient FitB+ PathwaysA+ EvidenceA+ Formulation Logic
Vitamin K · 20 mcgMagnesium · 140 mgCalcium · 210 mgVitamin D · 17.5 mcgCopper · 2 mgManganese · 2 mgZinc · 15 mgVitamin C · 60 mg

Vitamin D supports calcium absorption, and magnesium contributes to normal bone metabolism when intake is low. Copper helps maintain the bone's collagen framework; extra intake has no established benefit once needs are met. Calcium contributes 210 mg per serving but was not counted in the saved findings. The vitamin K is K1, so the limited bone-density findings for MK-7 cannot be assumed for it.

How this product is rated for Bone Health

Ingredient fit65

The formula includes several bone-related nutrients, but its broad multivitamin focus and modest mineral amounts limit specificity.
Goal fit
Bone-related nutrients share the formula with nine other actives directed at other functions.
Dose adequacy
Vitamin D and magnesium contribute partially; calcium and vitamin C fall below the saved inclusion thresholds.

Pathways80

Collagen framework formation leads the saved findings, and calcium regulation also reaches the coverage target.
Depth
Collagen framework formation is the strongest recorded area, including copper's normal structural role.
Breadth
Calcium regulation and collagen framework formation reach the recorded target; mineral supply and bone-protein activation do not.

Evidence98

Zinc leads the saved evidence finding, without establishing routine extra skeletal benefit. Qualifying preparations meet the recorded criteria.
Evidence strength
Zinc leads the finding; its essential functions do not prove additional bone benefit above adequate intake.
Studied preparation
The counted preparations meet the saved criterion; K1 does not inherit the specific clinical findings for MK-7.

Formulation logic97

Vitamin D's qualifying calcium partner is missing in the saved findings. No defined conflict was matched, and all included usable amounts reach the threshold.
Partner coverage
Calcium is present but too low to fulfill vitamin D's recorded partner requirement.
Conflicts
No defined ingredient conflict was matched in the supplied calculation.
Effective doses
All counted usable amounts meet the recorded threshold; calcium and vitamin C were excluded earlier for their low amounts.
Study evidence
Calcium Supportive 144 studies
Copper Disputed 20 studies
Folate Supportive 50 studies
Magnesium Supportive 48 studies
Manganese Adverse 12 studies
Vitamin A Adverse 56 studies
Vitamin C Supportive 46 studies
Vitamin D Supportive 202 studies
Vitamin K Supportive 78 studies
Zinc Supportive 33 studies
Immunity
Impact
Highest effect
C Ingredient FitA+ PathwaysA+ EvidenceA+ Formulation Logic
Magnesium · 140 mgVitamin C · 60 mgZinc · 15 mgVitamin A · 1050 mcgVitamin D · 17.5 mcgSelenium · 110 mcg

Zinc and selenium contribute to normal immune nutrition, with vitamin B6, B12, folate and copper relevant when low intake would otherwise impair immune-cell function. Vitamin A also contributes to barrier nutrition. These nutritional roles do not establish extra infection prevention when intake is adequate.

How this product is rated for Immunity

Ingredient fit61

Relevant nutrient declarations provide the immune connection. Small or unresolved amounts limit some contributions without establishing ingredient absence.
Goal fit
The relevant declared ingredients connect with immune support; additional ingredients and other product purposes make the focus less exclusive.
Dose adequacy
Declared amounts contribute to varying degrees; the comparison does not make higher quantities a proven prevention or treatment dose.

Pathways98

The saved findings concentrate on lymphocyte function and immune regulation. These associations do not establish clinical immune protection.
Depth
The strongest saved association is lymphocyte function and immune regulation, which does not establish a measured immune or infection outcome.
Breadth
Several immune-related areas meet the saved coverage threshold, without establishing broad protection against infections.

Evidence100

Zinc leads the counted contribution. Normal nutrient functions and any regular-use cold findings retain their distinct limitations.
Evidence strength
Zinc provides the strongest counted contribution, with the specific nutritional or regular-use limitations retained.
Studied preparation
The counted preparations are accepted in the saved comparison; this does not independently establish clinical equivalence or an advantage for this product.

Formulation logic100

No required partner or configured conflict was found. Counted ingredient amounts meet the saved inclusion threshold, without proving an extra combination benefit.
Partner coverage
No required partner is missing for the counted ingredients, without establishing an added immune benefit from combining them.
Conflicts
No configured formulation conflict was found at the supplied ingredient amounts and partner declarations.
Effective doses
All counted ingredients meet the saved inclusion threshold; this does not prove an effective infection-prevention or treatment dose.
Study evidence
Magnesium Supportive 8 studies
Selenium Mixed 37 studies
Vitamin A Supportive 107 studies
Vitamin C Supportive 53 studies
Vitamin D Supportive 85 studies
Vitamin E Supportive 21 studies
Zinc Supportive 73 studies
Hair Health
Impact
High effect
C+ Ingredient FitC- PathwaysA+ EvidenceA+ Formulation Logic
Biotin · 75 mcgVitamin D · 17.5 mcgZinc · 15 mgVitamin C · 60 mg

Zinc can support hair health when deficiency contributes to diffuse shedding. Biotin has a similar deficiency-related role, although its 75 mcg per serving is below the saved comparison's minimum amount allowance. Other nutrients support normal functions, but their recorded contributions do not establish routine hair regrowth, and vitamin A or selenium excess can worsen hair loss.

How this product is rated for Hair Health

Ingredient fit67

Hair-related ingredients sit within a broader formula, reducing its specific focus on this goal. The declared amounts provide a mixture of partial and full contributions relative to the supplied reference exposures.
Goal fit
Hair-related ingredients sit within a broader formula, reducing its specific focus on this goal.
Dose adequacy
The declared amounts provide a mixture of partial and full contributions relative to the supplied reference exposures.

Pathways55

The strongest recorded route concerns antioxidant protection around hair follicles; this is not itself proof of hair regrowth.
Depth
The strongest recorded route concerns antioxidant protection around hair follicles; this is not itself proof of hair regrowth.
Breadth
Coverage is concentrated in follicle antioxidant protection, with the other assessed routes below the coverage threshold.

Evidence98

Zinc leads the recorded evidence contribution, with practical hair relevance tied to correcting deficiency.
Evidence strength
Zinc leads the recorded evidence contribution, with practical hair relevance tied to correcting deficiency.
Studied preparation
The counted preparations receive full recognition in the saved comparison, without establishing a hair outcome for every included nutrient.

Formulation logic100

No counted ingredient lacks a required partner or triggers the applied combination-conflict checks. The counted ingredients meet the comparison's minimum amount threshold.
Partner coverage
No counted ingredient lacks a required partner in the checks applied.
Conflicts
No combination matches the specific conflict checks applied; this does not establish overall suitability or exclude excess-intake concerns.
Effective doses
All counted ingredients meet the minimum amount threshold used here, which is not a proven hair-growth dose.
Study evidence
Biotin Supportive 4 studies
Copper Adverse 4 studies
Folate Mixed 15 studies
Niacin Disputed 2 studies
Selenium Disputed 7 studies
Vitamin A Disputed 13 studies
Vitamin D Disputed 34 studies
Vitamin E No effect 3 studies
Zinc Supportive 22 studies
Testosterone Support
Impact
Moderate effect
D- Ingredient FitF PathwaysA EvidenceA+ Formulation Logic
Magnesium · 140 mgZinc · 15 mgVitamin D · 17.5 mcg

Zinc may help restore testosterone when low zinc levels are the cause of a reduction. That makes its relevance depend on nutritional need: taking extra zinc hasn't been shown to raise testosterone when you already get enough.

How this product is rated for Testosterone Support

Ingredient fit44

Zinc is relevant chiefly when low zinc is affecting testosterone. Several other ingredients have no clear direct testosterone contribution.
Goal fit
Zinc has a possible testosterone connection; the additional ingredients have no clear direct contribution to this goal.
Dose adequacy
Zinc supplies 15 mg per serving; other nutrient amounts vary. These quantities do not predict hormone benefits.

Pathways18

Zinc can matter when deficiency lowers testosterone; the ingredient amounts do not demonstrate a broader hormone effect.
Depth
Zinc can matter when deficiency lowers testosterone; the ingredient amounts do not demonstrate a broader hormone effect.
Breadth
The ingredients do not show a dependable effect across several routes affecting testosterone.

Evidence93

Zinc is relevant chiefly when low zinc is affecting testosterone. The relevant benefit concerns correcting low zinc, rather than boosting already adequate levels.
Evidence strength
Zinc is relevant chiefly when low zinc is affecting testosterone.
Studied preparation
Vitamin B6’s presence or form does not demonstrate a testosterone benefit.

Formulation logic100

No particular ingredient conflict or missing required partner is identified.
Partner coverage
No additional partner ingredient is required for the ingredient roles described here.
Conflicts
No particular ingredient conflict is identified.
Effective doses
The declared nutrient amounts vary; reaching a reference amount does not mean they will raise testosterone.
Study evidence
Magnesium Disputed 5 studies
Selenium No effect 16 studies
Vitamin D Supportive 56 studies
Vitamin E Disputed 3 studies
Zinc Disputed 7 studies
Impact
Moderate effect
C Ingredient FitF PathwaysA+ EvidenceA+ Formulation Logic
Biotin · 75 mcgNiacin · 18 mgVitamin B12 · 18 mcgRiboflavin · 1.7 mgThiamin · 1.35 mgVitamin B5 · 16 mgVitamin B6 · 3 mgVitamin D · 17.5 mcgZinc · 15 mgMagnesium · 140 mg

B vitamins help your body carry out its usual energy-producing reactions. Selenium also helps activate thyroid hormones, but neither role means that taking more will speed up metabolism when you're already getting enough. Chromium's connection to blood sugar handling adds a different metabolic function; whether this combination raises everyday calorie burning remains unclear.

How this product is rated for Metabolism Support

Ingredient fit65

The nutrients serve normal metabolic functions; those roles do not imply increased calorie burning above adequate intake.
Goal fit
The nutrients serve normal metabolic functions; those roles do not imply increased calorie burning above adequate intake.
Dose adequacy
Vitamin B12: 18 mcg; Vitamin B3 (Niacin): 18 mg; Zinc: 15 mg. Amounts alone do not demonstrate a calorie-burning benefit.

Pathways5

The clearest metabolic connection is blood sugar handling, which is different from raising energy expenditure.
Depth
The clearest metabolic connection is blood sugar handling, which is different from raising energy expenditure.
Breadth
Blood sugar handling is the main pathway connection; broader calorie-burning effects remain unclear.

Evidence100

The nutrients serve normal metabolic functions; those roles do not imply increased calorie burning above adequate intake.
Evidence strength
The nutrients serve normal metabolic functions; those roles do not imply increased calorie burning above adequate intake.
Studied preparation
The nutrient preparations have relevant background information; ordinary metabolic roles do not demonstrate an extra calorie-burning effect.

Formulation logic100

The relevant ingredients do not require an additional partner, and no particular ingredient conflict is identified.
Partner coverage
No required ingredient partner is missing for the relevant roles described.
Conflicts
No particular ingredient conflict is identified.
Effective doses
The relevant ingredients have usable serving amounts, although these comparisons do not show that they increase calorie burning.
Study evidence
Biotin Supportive 5 studies
Chromium Supportive 47 studies
Magnesium Supportive 61 studies
Niacin Supportive 17 studies
Selenium Mixed 28 studies
Thiamin Supportive 11 studies
Vitamin B6 Supportive 16 studies
Vitamin D Supportive 65 studies
Zinc Supportive 12 studies

Ingredients

IngredientAmount per servingScore
Vitamin A (Beta-Carotene, Vitamin A Acetate)
1050 mcg
Vitamin C (Ascorbic Acid)
60 mg
Vitamin D3 (Cholecalciferol)
17.5 mcg
Vitamin E (DL-Alpha-Tocopheryl Acetate)
10 mg
Vitamin K (Phytonadione)
20 mcg
Thiamine (Thiamine Mononitrate)
1.35 mg
Riboflavin
1.7 mg
Niacin (Niacinamide)
18 mg
Vitamin B6 (Pyridoxine Hydrochloride)
3 mg
Folate
667 mcg DFE
Vitamin B12 (Cyanocobalamin)
18 mcg
Biotin
75 mcg
Pantothenic Acid (D-Calcium Pantothenate)
16 mg
Calcium (Calcium Carbonate, Dicalcium Phosphate)
210 mg 72
Magnesium (Magnesium Oxide)
140 mg
Zinc (Zinc Oxide)
15 mg 62
Selenium (Sodium Selenate)
110 mcg 64
Copper (Copper Oxide)
2 mg 66
Manganese (Manganese Sulfate)
2 mg 70
Chromium (Chromium Chloride)
120 mcg 37
Lycopene
300 mcg
Gluten Free Men 18–50
Report overview
C+ Active Ingredient Quality & BioavailabilityC+ Dose, Safety & Label TransparencyA+ Value
Each serving provides 210 mg of calcium from calcium carbonate and dicalcium phosphate. The whole product costs about $0.07 per serving.
How this ingredient is rated

Active Ingredient Quality & Bioavailability65

The 210 mg calcium amount is stated with several sources, but their individual contributions are unknown.
Calcium Form & Absorption Potential
The listed calcium forms are calcium carbonate and dicalcium phosphate; their individual proportions are not available.
Elemental Calcium Transparency
The amount of calcium itself is stated as 210 mg per serving.

Dose, Safety & Label Transparency66

Each serving provides 210 mg of calcium. A flow agent is recorded among the product ingredients.
Absorption-Optimized Serving Dose
Each serving provides 210 mg of calcium.
Formulation Purity & Additives
A flow agent is recorded among the product ingredients.

Value100

The whole product costs about $0.07 per serving.
Price Per Serving Efficiency
The whole product costs about $0.07 per serving.
D- Active Ingredient Quality & BioavailabilityA- Dose, Safety & Label TransparencyA+ Value
A serving supplies 2 mg of manganese as manganese sulfate. The whole-product serving costs about $0.07.
How this ingredient is rated

Active Ingredient Quality & Bioavailability40

Manganese sulfate is an inorganic form; the comparison favors some named chelates and organic salts.
Manganese Chemical Form
Manganese sulfate is an inorganic form; the comparison favors some named chelates and organic salts.

Dose, Safety & Label Transparency86

The serving provides 2 mg of manganese, and the mineral amount is stated.
Manganese Dosage Efficacy & Safety
The serving provides 2 mg of manganese.
Elemental Weight Disclosure
The manganese amount is stated as 2 mg per serving.

Value100

A whole-product serving costs about $0.07, a relatively low price in this comparison.
Price per Serving vs. Median
A whole-product serving costs about $0.07, a relatively low price in this comparison.
F Active Ingredient Quality & BioavailabilityA- Dose, Safety & Label TransparencyA+ Value
Each serving lists 2 mg of copper as copper oxide, a form the evaluation notes is poorly absorbed. The zinc-to-copper ratio is about 7.5:1, outside the evaluation’s balance criterion.
How this ingredient is rated

Active Ingredient Quality & Bioavailability30

Copper oxide is the recorded form; the evaluation notes that it is poorly absorbed. The amount and source are recorded on the copper row.
Copper Form Bioavailability
Copper oxide is the recorded form; the evaluation notes that it is poorly absorbed.
Elemental Copper Labeling Clarity
The copper row records 2 mg per serving and names copper oxide as its source.

Dose, Safety & Label Transparency85

2 mg of copper per serving matches the evaluation’s selected serving target. The recorded zinc-to-copper ratio is about 7.5:1, outside the evaluation’s balance criterion.
Copper Dosage Safety & Efficacy
2 mg of copper per serving matches the evaluation’s selected serving target.
Zinc-to-Copper Balance
The serving has 15 mg zinc and 2 mg copper, a ratio of about 7.5:1, outside the evaluation’s balance criterion.

Value100

A whole-product serving costs about $0.07.
Price Per Serving Efficiency
A whole-product serving costs about $0.07.
Report alternatives

Sources

Published studies used for the product analysis and the top-ranked studies for each ingredient and goal.

  1. What is the impact of daily oral supplementation of vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) plus calcium on the incidence of hip fracture in older people? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Manoj P; Derwin R; George S · International journal of older people nursing · 2023
    Meta-analysis12,620 participants7 studies pooledBone Health forCalcium
  2. Calcium supplementation prevents seasonal bone loss and changes in biochemical markers of bone turnover in elderly New England women: a randomized placebo-controlled trial.
    Storm D; Eslin R; Porter ES; Musgrave K; Vereault D; Patton C; Kessenich C; Mohan S; Chen T; Holick MF; Rosen CJ · The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 1998
    Randomized trial60 participantsBone Health forCalcium
  3. The effects of calcium supplementation (milk powder or tablets) and exercise on bone density in postmenopausal women.
    Prince R; Devine A; Dick I; Criddle A; Kerr D; Kent N; Price R; Randell A · Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 1995
    Randomized trial168 participantsBone Health forCalcium
  4. The efficacy of calcium supplementation alone in elderly Thai women over a 2-year period: a randomized controlled trial.
    Rajatanavin R; Chailurkit L; Saetung S; Thakkinstian A; Nimitphong H · Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2014
    Randomized trial404 participantsBone Health forCalcium
  5. Calcium-enriched foods and bone mass growth in prepubertal girls: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
    Bonjour JP; Carrie AL; Ferrari S; Clavien H; Slosman D; Theintz G; Rizzoli R · The Journal of clinical investigation · 1997
    Randomized trial149 participantsBone Health forCalcium
  6. The Association between Dietary and Circulating Copper Levels and Osteoporosis: a Scoping Review.
    Ju Y; Xiong W; Pang Y; Chen Z; Hou J; Zheng S; Li Z; Liu T; Xia H; Xia M; Zhong Y; Li J; Jiang X · Biological trace element research · 2026
    Scoping review18 studies pooledBone Health forCopper
  7. Association between dietary copper, iron, zinc, selenium intake and osteopenia or osteoporosis in elderly hypertensive patients: a retrospective cohort study.
    Chen M; Jia L; Gao R · Frontiers in nutrition · 2024
    Cohort study5,286 participantsBone Health forCopper
  8. Associations of dietary copper intake with total bone mineral density and lumbar spine bone mineral density in American adults.
    Hu M; Wang Z; Li C; Zheng Y; Hu J · Medicine · 2025
    Cross-sectional studyBone Health forCopper
  9. The association between dietary mineral intake and bone mineral density: a cross-sectional study.
    Wei M; Wei J; Huang S · Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2025
    Cross-sectional study11,520 participantsBone Health forCopper
  10. Association between dietary copper intake and bone mineral density in children and adolescents aged 8-19 years: A cross-sectional study.
    Cui A; Yan J; Li H; Fan Z; Wei X; Wang H; Zhuang Y · PloS one · 2024
    Cross-sectional study6,965 participantsBone Health forCopper
  11. Association between RBC folate and lumbar bone mineral density in postmenopausal women, a cross-sectional study from NHANES 2009-2018.
    Wei H; Jin Z; Zhou L; Tang G; Chai S; Che X; Tan Y; Zeng W · Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025
    Cross-sectional study1,315 participantsBone Health forFolate
  12. Genetic variants modify the associations of concentrations of methylmalonic acid, vitamin B-12, vitamin B-6, and folate with bone mineral density.
    Liu CT; Karasik D; Xu H; Zhou Y; Broe K; Cupples LA; Cpgm de Groot L; Ham A; Hannan MT; Hsu YH; Jacques P; McLean RR; Paul L; Selhub J; Trajanoska K; van der Velde N; van Schoor N; Kiel DP · The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2021
    Cohort study4,310 participantsBone Health forFolate
  13. Adequate Intake and Supplementation of B Vitamins, in Particular Folic Acid, can Play a Protective Role in Bone Health.
    Rondanelli M; Tartara A; Fossari F; Vecchio V; Faliva MA; Naso M; Perna S; Nichetti M; Peroni G · Current aging science · 2022
    Narrative review35,298 participants29 studies pooledBone Health forFolate Bone Health forVitamin B6
  14. Relation of homocysteine, folate, and vitamin B12 to bone mineral density of postmenopausal women.
    Cagnacci A; Baldassari F; Rivolta G; Arangino S; Volpe A · Bone · 2004
    Cross-sectional study161 participantsBone Health forFolate
  15. Dietary intake of folate, but not vitamin B2 or B12, is associated with increased bone mineral density 5 years after the menopause: results from a 10-year follow-up study in early postmenopausal women.
    Rejnmark L; Vestergaard P; Hermann AP; Brot C; Eiken P; Mosekilde L · Calcified tissue international · 2008
    Cohort study1,869 participantsBone Health forFolate
  16. Association between Serum Magnesium and Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.
    Dominguez LJ; Veronese N; Ciriminna S; Pérez-Albela JL; Vásquez-López VF; Rodas-Regalado S; Di Bella G; Parisi A; Tagliaferri F; Barbagallo M · Nutrients · 2023
    Meta-analysis119,755 participants4 studies pooledBone Health forMagnesium
  17. Bioabsorbable Magnesium-Based Materials Potential and Safety in Bone Surgery: A Systematic Review.
    Hung CH; Kwok YC; Yip J; Wong HH; Leung YY · Craniomaxillofacial trauma & reconstruction · 2025
    Systematic review386 participants8 studies pooledBone Health forMagnesium
  18. Vascularized bone grafting fixed by biodegradable magnesium screw for treating osteonecrosis of the femoral head.
    Zhao D; Huang S; Lu F; Wang B; Yang L; Qin L; Yang K; Li Y; Li W; Wang W; Tian S; Zhang X; Gao W; Wang Z; Zhang Y; Xie X; Wang J; Li J · Biomaterials · 2016
    Randomized trial48 participantsBone Health forMagnesium
  19. An update on magnesium and bone health.
    Rondanelli M; Faliva MA; Tartara A; Gasparri C; Perna S; Infantino V; Riva A; Petrangolini G; Peroni G · Biometals : an international journal on the role of metal ions in biology, biochemistry, and medicine · 2022
    Narrative reviewBone Health forMagnesium
  20. Sex-specific differences in the association of magnesium intake with femoral neck bone mineral density among older adults.
    Wang B; Tan X; Yao X; Zhu Z · Endocrine connections · 2025
    Cross-sectional study1,343 participantsBone Health forMagnesium