One Daily Men's Health

One Daily Men's Health

Equate4.7 (3,007 ratings)
Format:Tablet Quantity: 100 Tablet(s) · 100 servings
Goals
$5.48 $0.05 per serving

Product analysis

50 out of 100

One Daily Men's Health offers an economical mix of nutrients that can help fill dietary gaps and support normal immune and energy functions. Most ingredient preparations are not clearly identified in the main nutrient listing, making quality comparisons difficult.

AI assessment of the formula, label and price. How scoring works

Nutrient Quality20

Most preparations are not clearly identified in the main nutrient listing, leaving much of the form quality uncertain. Synthetic vitamin E and zinc oxide are less favorable form choices, and several mineral mixtures have unclear proportions.

Ingredient Transparency64

Amounts are listed for the named nutrients, making the declared serving easy to see. Nearly all forms are missing from the main nutrient listing, limiting a detailed comparison of preparations.

Value For Money63

Vitamin A and several minerals compare favorably on cost, making much of the formula economical. Vitamin E offers weaker value, and value for a number of other nutrients remains uncertain.

Customer Satisfaction87

Customer ratings are strongly positive across thousands of reviews. The substantial feedback gives a useful satisfaction picture without establishing the proposed health benefits.

Product Focus35

The clearest purpose is nutritional support when the diet falls short. The broad ingredient mix covers several health aims, without establishing extra benefits when nutrient needs are already met.

Format
Tablet
Container
100 Tablet(s)
Per serving
$0.05
Customer rating
4.7 · 3,007 ratings
Report analysis

Goals

Everyday Health
Impact
Highest effect
B Ingredient FitA+ PathwaysA- EvidenceA+ Formulation Logic
Folate · 400 mcgVitamin B12 · 18 mcgVitamin D · 700 IUMagnesium · 140 mgVitamin K · 20 mcgSelenium · 110 mcgZinc · 15 mgVitamin C · 60 mg

Magnesium contributes to normal energy and mineral metabolism, with usefulness mainly when dietary intake falls short. The B vitamins provide nutritional support for normal metabolism and, where folate and B12 are included, blood formation. Vitamin C, Zinc and Selenium offer nutritional support for normal antioxidant or immune functions when intake is low. Amounts above nutritional adequacy do not establish additional general-health benefit.

How this product is rated for Everyday Health

Ingredient fit78

Vitamin B6, Zinc, Vitamin B9 (Folate) and Selenium connects this product to routine nutrient provision. Its practical value depends on filling dietary gaps.
Goal fit
Nutritional support shares the formula with ingredients aimed at other goals, reducing its focus on routine nutrient provision.
Dose adequacy
The relevant amounts make a partial nutritional contribution against the supplied amount references, rather than covering every included nutrient equally.

Pathways100

Normal energy metabolism is the strongest represented nutritional role. Several nutritional roles are represented.
Depth
Normal energy metabolism is the strongest represented nutritional role.
Breadth
The represented roles include energy metabolism cofactors, one-carbon metabolism and blood formation, antioxidant and immune defence, with breadth determined by the supplied amounts.

Evidence86

Magnesium is the main contributor to the saved evidence finding. The supplied evidence supports nutritional usefulness when intake is low, without establishing extra benefit in adequately nourished adults.
Evidence strength
Magnesium leads the saved evidence finding; its relevance is nutritional support when intake is low, without established benefit above adequacy.
Studied preparation
The included nutrient declarations satisfy the supplied preparation checks, without evidence that a particular form or delivery method provides greater general-health benefit.

Formulation logic98

The supplied checks identify no missing required partner or configured conflict. Some included nutrient amounts remain below the comparison threshold.
Partner coverage
No required nutrient partner is missing under the supplied checks; co-presence does not establish added benefit from the combination.
Conflicts
No configured ingredient conflict was identified in the supplied checks.
Effective doses
Vitamin D falls below the supplied amount threshold; other included contributions meet it. This threshold is a comparison reference, not proven clinical efficacy.
Study evidence
Folate Supportive 80 studies
Magnesium Supportive 114 studies
Selenium Supportive 70 studies
Vitamin C Supportive 56 studies
Vitamin D Supportive 115 studies
Vitamin K Supportive 34 studies
Zinc Supportive 60 studies
Immunity
Impact
High effect
D+ Ingredient FitB- PathwaysA+ EvidenceA Formulation Logic
Magnesium · 140 mgVitamin C · 60 mgZinc · 15 mgVitamin A · 3500 IUVitamin D · 700 IUSelenium · 110 mcg

Zinc and selenium provide nutrients used in normal immune function; selenium is not expected to add benefit when status is already adequate. Copper, B6, B12 and folate can help fill dietary gaps that impair immune-cell function. Vitamin A, D and E amounts remain unresolved, limiting their contributions. These nutritional roles do not establish prevention of infection or stronger immunity above adequacy.

How this product is rated for Immunity

Ingredient fit52

Relevant ingredients contribute to the immune goal, while additional actives make the formula less focused on these functions.
Goal fit
Relevant ingredients contribute to the immune goal, while additional actives make the formula less focused on these functions.
Dose adequacy
The relevant amounts contribute partly to the saved comparisons, with unresolved quantities contributing less.

Pathways73

The strongest represented area is oxidative and inflammatory balance. The saved findings extend across two immune functions, with the remaining areas less represented.
Depth
The strongest represented area is oxidative and inflammatory balance.
Breadth
The saved findings extend across two immune functions, with the remaining areas less represented.

Evidence100

Zinc leads the saved evidence finding, primarily reflecting nutritional roles rather than proven added infection prevention.
Evidence strength
Zinc leads the saved evidence finding, primarily reflecting nutritional roles rather than proven added infection prevention.
Studied preparation
The counted preparations match the saved preparation finding; this does not establish superior benefit from particular forms or delivery.

Formulation logic93

The counted ingredients have their relevant partners or contribute independently, and no listed formulation conflict was triggered.
Partner coverage
The counted ingredients can contribute independently or have their relevant partners; an extra combined benefit is not established.
Conflicts
No listed formulation conflict was triggered; this does not establish safety of the whole product.
Effective doses
The unresolved Vitamin D, Vitamin A, Vitamin E amounts fall below the saved minimum comparison; the other counted ingredients reach it.
Study evidence
Magnesium Supportive 8 studies
Selenium Mixed 37 studies
Vitamin A Supportive 107 studies
Vitamin C Supportive 53 studies
Vitamin D Supportive 85 studies
Vitamin E Supportive 21 studies
Zinc Supportive 73 studies
Bone Health
Impact
High effect
C- Ingredient FitC PathwaysA+ EvidenceA Formulation Logic
Vitamin K · 20 mcgMagnesium · 140 mgCalcium · 210 mgVitamin D · 700 IUCopper · 2 mgManganese · 2 mgZinc · 15 mgVitamin C · 60 mg

Calcium and magnesium supply minerals needed for normal bone metabolism when dietary intake is low. Vitamin C supports collagen formation and copper helps cross-link that matrix, with the clearest benefit from correcting inadequate intake. Vitamin D is present but its active amount remains unresolved, limiting assessment of calcium-absorption support. The vitamin K declaration does not establish the MK-7 preparation used in the supplied bone studies.

How this product is rated for Bone Health

Ingredient fit57

Bone-related nutrients sit within a broader formula containing ingredients serving other purposes. Unresolved active nutrient amounts limit assessment, alongside the declared amounts of other bone-related ingredients.
Goal fit
Bone-related nutrients sit within a broader formula containing ingredients serving other purposes.
Dose adequacy
Unresolved active nutrient amounts limit assessment, alongside the declared amounts of other bone-related ingredients.

Pathways60

The strongest finding concerns the collagen framework of bone, rather than direct mineral supply. Support is concentrated in collagen matrix formation.
Depth
The strongest finding concerns the collagen framework of bone, rather than direct mineral supply.
Breadth
Support is concentrated in collagen matrix formation.

Evidence98

Zinc leads the saved evidence comparison, but supplied context does not establish independent routine bone-density or fracture benefit. The counted preparations meet the saved preparation criteria, without establishing superior forms or guaranteed clinical outcomes.
Evidence strength
Zinc leads the saved evidence comparison, but supplied context does not establish independent routine bone-density or fracture benefit.
Studied preparation
The counted preparations meet the saved preparation criteria, without establishing superior forms or guaranteed clinical outcomes.

Formulation logic92

The calcium–vitamin D pairing is incomplete in the saved findings, limiting complementary mineral and absorption support. No configured ingredient conflict was identified in the supplied findings.
Partner coverage
The calcium–vitamin D pairing is incomplete in the saved findings, limiting complementary mineral and absorption support.
Conflicts
No configured ingredient conflict was identified in the supplied findings.
Effective doses
Vitamin D, Vitamin A do not meet the saved amount criterion; this differs from demonstrating ineffectiveness.
Study evidence
Calcium Supportive 144 studies
Copper Disputed 20 studies
Folate Supportive 50 studies
Magnesium Supportive 48 studies
Manganese Adverse 12 studies
Vitamin A Adverse 56 studies
Vitamin C Supportive 46 studies
Vitamin D Supportive 202 studies
Vitamin K Supportive 78 studies
Zinc Supportive 33 studies
Testosterone Support
Impact
Moderate effect
F Ingredient FitF PathwaysA EvidenceA Formulation Logic
Magnesium · 140 mgZinc · 15 mgVitamin D · 700 IU

Zinc may help restore testosterone when low zinc is contributing to low levels. The benefit concerns correcting a deficiency; taking extra zinc when you already get enough isn't known to raise testosterone.

How this product is rated for Testosterone Support

Ingredient fit38

Zinc is most relevant when low zinc is contributing to low testosterone.
Goal fit
Zinc relates to testosterone through deficiency correction; other declared nutrients do not imply an additional hormone benefit.
Dose adequacy
Zinc 15 mg; Selenium 110 mcg; Vitamin B6 3 mg; Magnesium 140 mg. These serving amounts do not guarantee a testosterone increase.

Pathways18

The relevant connection is nutritional status rather than a guaranteed increase in testosterone.
Depth
The ingredients relate to testosterone production or availability, without implying a predictable hormone increase.
Breadth
A broad effect across the proposed hormone routes is not supported here.

Evidence93

Zinc is most relevant when low zinc is contributing to low testosterone.
Evidence strength
Zinc is most relevant when low zinc is contributing to low testosterone.
Studied preparation
The relevant ingredient preparations match those in the hormone context, while the limits on who may benefit still apply.

Formulation logic90

No particular ingredient conflict or missing required partner is identified.
Partner coverage
No required ingredient partner is missing for the included ingredients.
Conflicts
No particular ingredient conflict is identified.
Effective doses
Vitamin D, Vitamin E are below the comparison range used here; this alone doesn't prove ineffectiveness.
Study evidence
Magnesium Disputed 5 studies
Selenium No effect 16 studies
Vitamin D Supportive 56 studies
Vitamin E Disputed 3 studies
Zinc Disputed 7 studies
Hair Health
Impact
High effect
C- Ingredient FitC- PathwaysA+ EvidenceA Formulation Logic
Biotin · 75 mcgVitamin D · 700 IUZinc · 15 mgVitamin C · 60 mg

Zinc can help when deficiency contributes to diffuse shedding. Selenium and copper have normal antioxidant and pigmentation roles, but those functions do not establish routine hair regrowth. Biotin, vitamin C and B12 fall below the saved inclusion criteria, while unresolved vitamin A and D amounts limit interpretation.

How this product is rated for Hair Health

Ingredient fit56

Relevant ingredients and their declared amounts shape this finding. The recognized amounts provide partial coverage of the supplied comparison anchors; unresolved amounts contribute nothing to this finding.
Goal fit
Relevant nutritional ingredients are present alongside a broader formula.
Dose adequacy
The recognized amounts provide partial coverage of the supplied comparison anchors; unresolved amounts contribute nothing to this finding.

Pathways55

The strongest recorded coverage concerns follicle antioxidant protection, rather than a demonstrated clinical hair outcome.
Depth
The strongest recorded coverage concerns follicle antioxidant protection, rather than a demonstrated clinical hair outcome.
Breadth
One named pathway reaches the supplied coverage criterion; broader coverage is limited.

Evidence98

Zinc provides the strongest recognized evidence contribution, subject to its specific hair-benefit limitations.
Evidence strength
Zinc provides the strongest recognized evidence contribution, subject to its specific hair-benefit limitations.
Studied preparation
The recognized preparations match those accepted in the saved comparison; that alone does not prove hair regrowth.

Formulation logic93

The saved findings identify no missing required partners or configured conflicts. The supplied amount criterion was not met for Vitamin A, Vitamin D.
Partner coverage
No missing required partner reduced the recognized ingredients’ contributions.
Conflicts
No configured ingredient conflict was recorded; this is not a general safety assessment.
Effective doses
The supplied amount criterion was not met for Vitamin A, Vitamin D.
Study evidence
Biotin Supportive 4 studies
Copper Adverse 4 studies
Folate Mixed 15 studies
Niacin Disputed 2 studies
Selenium Disputed 7 studies
Vitamin A Disputed 13 studies
Vitamin D Disputed 34 studies
Vitamin E No effect 3 studies
Zinc Supportive 22 studies
Impact
High effect
C- Ingredient FitB PathwaysA- EvidenceA Formulation Logic
Zinc · 15 mgVitamin C · 60 mgCopper · 2 mgSelenium · 110 mcgLycopene · 300 mcgVitamin E · 22.5 IU

Vitamin C and zinc support collagen formation and repair when intake is low, while niacin, riboflavin, B6 and biotin help prevent the skin changes caused by their deficiencies. These nutritional roles do not establish extra cosmetic benefit when intake is adequate. The small lycopene amount limits its relevance to the mixed findings on UV-related skin changes, and unresolved vitamin amounts restrict other contributions.

How this product is rated for Skin Health

Ingredient fit57

Recognized ingredients share the formula with ingredients serving other purposes, so its focus on skin is limited. Several nutrients contribute, but low lycopene and unresolved amounts limit the amount-based findings.
Goal fit
Recognized ingredients share the formula with ingredients serving other purposes, so its focus on skin is limited.
Dose adequacy
Several nutrients contribute, but low lycopene and unresolved amounts limit the amount-based findings.

Pathways76

The saved result places omega-3 under barrier lipids, but generic omega-3 cannot inherit the effects of purified EPA.
Depth
The saved result places omega-3 under barrier lipids, but generic omega-3 cannot inherit the effects of purified EPA.
Breadth
Collagen-related and UV-related areas meet the saved coverage criterion; broader clinical skin benefits are not established.

Evidence89

The strongest recognized nutrient findings do not establish extra cosmetic benefit in adequately nourished adults.
Evidence strength
The strongest recognized nutrient findings do not establish extra cosmetic benefit in adequately nourished adults.
Studied preparation
The saved result recognizes the retained preparations; the supplied scientific context still limits transfer of benefits from specific interventions.

Formulation logic93

No required partner is missing and no configured conflict was matched. Some recognized ingredients fall short of the amount check because their amounts are low or unresolved.
Partner coverage
The recognized ingredients can contribute alone or have the required partner; no missing-partner limitation was found.
Conflicts
No configured conflict was matched in the supplied facts; this does not establish general safety.
Effective doses
Some recognized ingredients fall short of the amount check because their amounts are low or unresolved.
Study evidence
Biotin Supportive 10 studies
Copper Supportive 16 studies
Lycopene Supportive 20 studies
Niacin Supportive 61 studies
Selenium Supportive 22 studies
Vitamin A Supportive 106 studies
Vitamin C Supportive 53 studies
Vitamin E Supportive 38 studies
Zinc Supportive 66 studies
Nail Health
Impact
Lower effect
F Ingredient FitF PathwaysF EvidenceA Formulation Logic
Biotin · 75 mcg
Study evidence
Biotin Supportive 8 studies
Calcium Supportive 1 study
Magnesium Not classified

No linked studies yet.

Selenium Adverse 1 study
Vitamin C Supportive 1 study
Vitamin D Supportive 8 studies
Vitamin E Supportive 6 studies
Zinc No effect 1 study

Ingredients

IngredientAmount per servingScore
Vitamin A (Beta-Carotene)
3500 IU 60
Vitamin C
60 mg
Vitamin D
700 IU 68
Vitamin E
22.5 IU 19
Vitamin K
20 mcg
Thiamine
1.35 mg
Riboflavin
1.7 mg
Niacin
18 mg
Vitamin B6
3 mg
Folic Acid
400 mcg 58
Vitamin B12
18 mcg
Biotin
75 mcg
Pantothenic Acid
16 mg
Calcium
210 mg 61
Magnesium
140 mg
Zinc
15 mg 62
Selenium
110 mcg 58
Copper
2 mg 60
Manganese
2 mg 58
Chromium
120 mcg 37
Lycopene
300 mcg
Men 18–50
Report overview
F Active Ingredient Quality & BioavailabilityC+ Dose, Safety & Label TransparencyA+ Value
The serving provides 3,500 IU of vitamin A at a low cost for the amount. Beta-carotene is named on the vitamin A row; retinyl acetate appears in Other Ingredients.
How this ingredient is rated

Active Ingredient Quality & Bioavailability33

Beta-carotene is named on the vitamin A row; retinyl acetate appears in Other Ingredients.
Vitamin A Chemical Form & Source
Beta-carotene is named on the vitamin A row; retinyl acetate appears in Other Ingredients.

Dose, Safety & Label Transparency67

The serving provides 3,500 IU of vitamin A. Retinyl acetate appears only in Other Ingredients, leaving the full source split unclear.
Dosage Efficacy & Safety Thresholds
The serving provides 3,500 IU of vitamin A.
Label Transparency of Specific Forms
Retinyl acetate appears only in Other Ingredients, leaving the full source split unclear.

Value100

The cost for the vitamin A amount is low.
Price per 5,000 IU Dose
The cost for the vitamin A amount is low.
Calcium · 210 mg OverallScore61
F Active Ingredient Quality & BioavailabilityC+ Dose, Safety & Label TransparencyA+ Value
A serving provides 210 mg calcium at a low cost per serving. The source of that calcium is unclear. A flow agent is listed.
How this ingredient is rated

Active Ingredient Quality & Bioavailability37

The calcium amount is stated, but its source is unclear.
Calcium Form & Absorption Potential
The calcium source is unspecified; Other Ingredients lists Dicalcium Phosphate, Calcium Carbonate, Calcium Pantothenate and Calcium Silicate, but their contribution to the calcium total is unclear.
Elemental Calcium Transparency
The label states 210 mg calcium per serving, but does not name its source on the calcium line.

Dose, Safety & Label Transparency66

Each serving provides 210 mg calcium. The ingredients include a flow agent.
Absorption-Optimized Serving Dose
Each serving provides 210 mg calcium.
Formulation Purity & Additives
The ingredients include a flow agent.

Value100

The cost per serving is low.
Price Per Serving Efficiency
The cost per serving is low.
Zinc · 15 mg OverallScore62
F Active Ingredient Quality & BioavailabilityA- Dose, Safety & Label TransparencyA+ Value
A serving provides 15 mg of zinc as zinc oxide. The form is assessed less favorably for absorption than some alternatives.
How this ingredient is rated

Active Ingredient Quality & Bioavailability20

Zinc Oxide is assessed less favorably for absorption than some other zinc forms.
Zinc Form Bioavailability
Zinc Oxide is assessed less favorably for absorption than some other zinc forms.

Dose, Safety & Label Transparency85

A serving supplies 15 mg of zinc and 2 mg of copper. Both amounts are stated.
Elemental Dose Transparency
The amount of elemental zinc and its source form are stated.
Zinc Dosage Safety & Effectiveness
A serving supplies 15 mg of zinc.
Zinc-to-Copper Mineral Balance
The serving has 15 mg of zinc and 2 mg of copper, a ratio of about 7.5:1. The preferred balance is uncertain.

Value100

A whole-product serving costs about $0.05, which is low in this comparison.
Price Per Serving Efficiency
A whole-product serving costs about $0.05, which is low in this comparison.
Report alternatives

Sources

Published studies used for the product analysis and the top-ranked studies for each ingredient and goal.

  1. What is the impact of daily oral supplementation of vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) plus calcium on the incidence of hip fracture in older people? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Manoj P; Derwin R; George S · International journal of older people nursing · 2023
    Meta-analysis12,620 participants7 studies pooledBone Health forCalcium
  2. Calcium supplementation prevents seasonal bone loss and changes in biochemical markers of bone turnover in elderly New England women: a randomized placebo-controlled trial.
    Storm D; Eslin R; Porter ES; Musgrave K; Vereault D; Patton C; Kessenich C; Mohan S; Chen T; Holick MF; Rosen CJ · The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 1998
    Randomized trial60 participantsBone Health forCalcium
  3. The effects of calcium supplementation (milk powder or tablets) and exercise on bone density in postmenopausal women.
    Prince R; Devine A; Dick I; Criddle A; Kerr D; Kent N; Price R; Randell A · Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 1995
    Randomized trial168 participantsBone Health forCalcium
  4. The efficacy of calcium supplementation alone in elderly Thai women over a 2-year period: a randomized controlled trial.
    Rajatanavin R; Chailurkit L; Saetung S; Thakkinstian A; Nimitphong H · Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2014
    Randomized trial404 participantsBone Health forCalcium
  5. Calcium-enriched foods and bone mass growth in prepubertal girls: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
    Bonjour JP; Carrie AL; Ferrari S; Clavien H; Slosman D; Theintz G; Rizzoli R · The Journal of clinical investigation · 1997
    Randomized trial149 participantsBone Health forCalcium
  6. The Association between Dietary and Circulating Copper Levels and Osteoporosis: a Scoping Review.
    Ju Y; Xiong W; Pang Y; Chen Z; Hou J; Zheng S; Li Z; Liu T; Xia H; Xia M; Zhong Y; Li J; Jiang X · Biological trace element research · 2026
    Scoping review18 studies pooledBone Health forCopper
  7. Association between dietary copper, iron, zinc, selenium intake and osteopenia or osteoporosis in elderly hypertensive patients: a retrospective cohort study.
    Chen M; Jia L; Gao R · Frontiers in nutrition · 2024
    Cohort study5,286 participantsBone Health forCopper
  8. Associations of dietary copper intake with total bone mineral density and lumbar spine bone mineral density in American adults.
    Hu M; Wang Z; Li C; Zheng Y; Hu J · Medicine · 2025
    Cross-sectional studyBone Health forCopper
  9. The association between dietary mineral intake and bone mineral density: a cross-sectional study.
    Wei M; Wei J; Huang S · Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2025
    Cross-sectional study11,520 participantsBone Health forCopper
  10. Association between dietary copper intake and bone mineral density in children and adolescents aged 8-19 years: A cross-sectional study.
    Cui A; Yan J; Li H; Fan Z; Wei X; Wang H; Zhuang Y · PloS one · 2024
    Cross-sectional study6,965 participantsBone Health forCopper
  11. Association between RBC folate and lumbar bone mineral density in postmenopausal women, a cross-sectional study from NHANES 2009-2018.
    Wei H; Jin Z; Zhou L; Tang G; Chai S; Che X; Tan Y; Zeng W · Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025
    Cross-sectional study1,315 participantsBone Health forFolate
  12. Genetic variants modify the associations of concentrations of methylmalonic acid, vitamin B-12, vitamin B-6, and folate with bone mineral density.
    Liu CT; Karasik D; Xu H; Zhou Y; Broe K; Cupples LA; Cpgm de Groot L; Ham A; Hannan MT; Hsu YH; Jacques P; McLean RR; Paul L; Selhub J; Trajanoska K; van der Velde N; van Schoor N; Kiel DP · The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2021
    Cohort study4,310 participantsBone Health forFolate
  13. Adequate Intake and Supplementation of B Vitamins, in Particular Folic Acid, can Play a Protective Role in Bone Health.
    Rondanelli M; Tartara A; Fossari F; Vecchio V; Faliva MA; Naso M; Perna S; Nichetti M; Peroni G · Current aging science · 2022
    Narrative review35,298 participants29 studies pooledBone Health forFolate Bone Health forVitamin B6
  14. Relation of homocysteine, folate, and vitamin B12 to bone mineral density of postmenopausal women.
    Cagnacci A; Baldassari F; Rivolta G; Arangino S; Volpe A · Bone · 2004
    Cross-sectional study161 participantsBone Health forFolate
  15. Dietary intake of folate, but not vitamin B2 or B12, is associated with increased bone mineral density 5 years after the menopause: results from a 10-year follow-up study in early postmenopausal women.
    Rejnmark L; Vestergaard P; Hermann AP; Brot C; Eiken P; Mosekilde L · Calcified tissue international · 2008
    Cohort study1,869 participantsBone Health forFolate
  16. Association between Serum Magnesium and Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.
    Dominguez LJ; Veronese N; Ciriminna S; Pérez-Albela JL; Vásquez-López VF; Rodas-Regalado S; Di Bella G; Parisi A; Tagliaferri F; Barbagallo M · Nutrients · 2023
    Meta-analysis119,755 participants4 studies pooledBone Health forMagnesium
  17. Bioabsorbable Magnesium-Based Materials Potential and Safety in Bone Surgery: A Systematic Review.
    Hung CH; Kwok YC; Yip J; Wong HH; Leung YY · Craniomaxillofacial trauma & reconstruction · 2025
    Systematic review386 participants8 studies pooledBone Health forMagnesium
  18. Vascularized bone grafting fixed by biodegradable magnesium screw for treating osteonecrosis of the femoral head.
    Zhao D; Huang S; Lu F; Wang B; Yang L; Qin L; Yang K; Li Y; Li W; Wang W; Tian S; Zhang X; Gao W; Wang Z; Zhang Y; Xie X; Wang J; Li J · Biomaterials · 2016
    Randomized trial48 participantsBone Health forMagnesium
  19. An update on magnesium and bone health.
    Rondanelli M; Faliva MA; Tartara A; Gasparri C; Perna S; Infantino V; Riva A; Petrangolini G; Peroni G · Biometals : an international journal on the role of metal ions in biology, biochemistry, and medicine · 2022
    Narrative reviewBone Health forMagnesium
  20. Sex-specific differences in the association of magnesium intake with femoral neck bone mineral density among older adults.
    Wang B; Tan X; Yao X; Zhu Z · Endocrine connections · 2025
    Cross-sectional study1,343 participantsBone Health forMagnesium