Multi For Her

Multi For Her

Nature Made4.6 (2,211 ratings)
Format:Tablet
Goals
$11.74 $0.00 per serving

Product analysis

53 out of 100

Multi For Her offers broad vitamin and mineral support for normal energy use, immune function and bone health when dietary intake falls short.

AI assessment of the formula, label and price. How scoring works

Nutrient Quality38

The mineral forms are mixed, with favorable iodine and molybdenum choices alongside less favorable selenium, copper and chromium forms. The available information is insufficient to judge several other ingredients confidently.

Ingredient Transparency76

All nutrient amounts and most forms are listed clearly. Some forms and the balance of the vitamin A blend remain unspecified.

Value For Money40

The available information does not support a dependable value comparison. Missing cost details should not be taken as evidence that the formula is expensive.

Customer Satisfaction83

Customer ratings are generally positive. A large pool of customer ratings provides a broader picture of satisfaction.

Product Focus39

The formula covers a broad range of nutritional needs. Its clearest benefit is filling dietary gaps, while iron is most relevant when iron intake or stores are low.

Format
Tablet
Customer rating
4.6 · 2,211 ratings
Report analysis

Goals

Everyday Health
Impact
Highest effect
B Ingredient FitA+ PathwaysA- EvidenceA+ Formulation Logic
Folate · 1000 mcg DFEVitamin B12 · 6 mcgVitamin D · 25 mcgMagnesium · 100 mgVitamin K · 80 mcgSelenium · 70 mcgZinc · 15 mgVitamin C · 180 mg

B vitamins contribute to normal energy metabolism, while folate supports blood formation. Vitamin D contributes to bone and mineral nutrition, and zinc and selenium contribute to normal defence functions. These nutrient contributions are useful when intake is low, without establishing extra benefit above adequate intake. Iron, iodine and calcium can also help fill dietary gaps; the small B12 amount did not meaningfully contribute.

How this product is rated for Everyday Health

Ingredient fit79

The useful contributions vary in size; Vitamin B12, Vitamin C fell below the minimum amount used here.
Goal fit
The relevant ingredients give this formula a focused connection to the supplied general-health roles.
Dose adequacy
The useful contributions vary in size; Vitamin B12, Vitamin C fell below the minimum amount used here.

Pathways100

The strongest contribution concerns normal energy metabolism. Other meaningful coverage is limited to the named nutrient roles.
Depth
The strongest finding concerns normal energy metabolism, based on the relevant ingredients and their supplied amounts.
Breadth
Meaningful coverage extends to normal energy metabolism, blood formation and related metabolism, bone and mineral nutrition, normal antioxidant and immune functions.

Evidence86

Magnesium provides the leading evidence contribution. Nutritional functions and the preparation findings do not establish broad health improvements above adequate intake.
Evidence strength
Magnesium leads the evidence contribution; its nutrient role does not establish extra benefit above adequate intake.
Studied preparation
The included preparations meet the preparation criteria; this does not establish superiority of a particular form.

Formulation logic100

The included ingredients can contribute without a missing required partner, and no configured conflict was found. Their amounts pass the saved minimum contribution check.
Partner coverage
The included ingredients can contribute independently or have their required partners; no extra benefit from combining them is established.
Conflicts
No configured ingredient conflict was identified in the supplied facts.
Effective doses
The included amounts all meet the minimum amount used here; that threshold is not a proven clinical dose.
Study evidence
Folate Supportive 80 studies
Magnesium Supportive 114 studies
Selenium Supportive 70 studies
Vitamin C Supportive 56 studies
Vitamin D Supportive 115 studies
Vitamin K Supportive 34 studies
Zinc Supportive 60 studies
Impact
Moderate effect
C- Ingredient FitF PathwaysA+ EvidenceA+ Formulation Logic
Iodine · 150 mcgVitamin D · 25 mcgVitamin B5 · 10 mgMagnesium · 100 mgRiboflavin · 1.7 mgThiamin · 1.5 mgVitamin B12 · 6 mcgIron · 18 mg

B vitamins support normal energy metabolism, while B12 at 6 mcg and folate contribute to normal blood formation. Their practical value for tiredness is mainly in filling a nutritional gap; extra intake does not reliably increase energy when needs are already met. Iron at 18 mg also relates to fatigue when iron intake or stores are low; a label alone cannot show that need. Magnesium adds 100 mg toward normal nutritional needs.

How this product is rated for Energy

Ingredient fit60

Several nutrients relate to energy through normal nutritional functions, alongside ingredients serving other goals.
Goal fit
Relevant energy-related nutrients sit alongside ingredients intended for other health uses.
Dose adequacy
The amounts provide a partial contribution against the saved comparisons; larger doses do not imply proportionally greater energy.

Pathways0

The saved assessment finds no meaningful coverage of its specified direct energy pathways; the contribution is nutritional.
Depth
None of the specified direct energy pathways receives a supported contribution in the saved finding.
Breadth
None of the specified direct energy pathways reaches the saved coverage threshold.

Evidence97

The strongest saved finding concerns iron, with practical usefulness depending on nutritional status.
Evidence strength
Iron supplies the strongest saved finding at an assessed amount; benefit still depends on nutritional need.
Studied preparation
Most assessed preparations meet the saved comparison, while iodine does not.

Formulation logic100

The assessed ingredients have no missing required partner or matched conflict.
Partner coverage
No required supporting ingredient is missing for the assessed contributions.
Conflicts
No listed conflict was matched in the supplied assessment.
Effective doses
All assessed ingredients clear the saved minimum amount threshold.
Study evidence
Iodine Adverse 3 studies
Iron Supportive 74 studies
Magnesium Supportive 4 studies
Thiamin Disputed 12 studies
Vitamin D Supportive 32 studies
Immunity
Impact
Highest effect
C Ingredient FitA+ PathwaysA+ EvidenceA+ Formulation Logic
Magnesium · 100 mgVitamin C · 180 mgZinc · 15 mgVitamin A · 750 mcgVitamin D · 25 mcgSelenium · 70 mcg

Vitamin A contributes to normal immune function and protective barriers. Zinc, Selenium and Vitamin D contribute to normal immune nutrition when intake is low. Iron, Copper, Folate, Vitamin B6 and Vitamin B12 can help address dietary gaps that impair immune-cell function. These nutrient roles do not establish extra immune benefit when intake is adequate.

How this product is rated for Immunity

Ingredient fit60

Relevant ingredients connect the product to immune support, with the strength of the amount finding depending on the selected serving.
Goal fit
Relevant ingredients contribute to the immune findings, while other active ingredients make this a broader-purpose formula.
Dose adequacy
The selected serving provides partial contributions across the relevant comparison amounts, without establishing a proven clinical response threshold.

Pathways98

The strongest saved finding concerns lymphocyte function and immune regulation. Other immune areas also receive substantial coverage.
Depth
The strongest saved finding concerns lymphocyte function and immune regulation; it does not by itself establish fewer infections.
Breadth
Several immune areas receive substantial coverage, although this does not establish broad clinical protection.

Evidence100

Zinc provides the leading saved evidence finding. Supplied clinical qualifications determine which benefits can be expected.
Evidence strength
Zinc leads the saved evidence finding; its clinical meaning remains bounded by the supplied nutrient or preparation-specific evidence.
Studied preparation
The saved preparation criteria are met, without establishing superiority of the supplied forms or transferability of every clinical outcome.

Formulation logic100

The relevant ingredients have the partners they require, no configured conflict was found, and included amounts meet the minimum saved comparison.
Partner coverage
Relevant ingredients can contribute independently or have their required partners present; an extra combination benefit is not established.
Conflicts
No configured conflict was identified among the supplied ingredients.
Effective doses
The included ingredients meet the saved minimum amount comparison; this does not establish proven clinical efficacy at those amounts.
Study evidence
Iron Supportive 23 studies
Magnesium Supportive 8 studies
Selenium Mixed 37 studies
Vitamin A Supportive 107 studies
Vitamin C Supportive 53 studies
Vitamin D Supportive 85 studies
Vitamin E Supportive 21 studies
Zinc Supportive 73 studies
Impact
High effect
C Ingredient FitB+ PathwaysA+ EvidenceA+ Formulation Logic
Vitamin K · 80 mcgMagnesium · 100 mgCalcium · 250 mgVitamin D · 25 mcgCopper · 2 mgManganese · 4 mgZinc · 15 mgVitamin C · 180 mg

Calcium and magnesium contribute to normal bone mineral supply, while vitamin D helps the body absorb and regulate calcium, particularly when intake or vitamin D status is low. Vitamin C and copper support the collagen framework when these nutrients are lacking. The vitamin K is K1, so the limited bone-density findings for MK-7 cannot be transferred to it.

How this product is rated for Bone Health

Ingredient fit61

Bone-related nutrients sit within a broader formula containing other active ingredients. Declared amounts provide partial support against the supplied amount benchmarks.
Goal fit
Bone-related nutrients sit within a broader formula containing other active ingredients.
Dose adequacy
Declared amounts provide partial support against the supplied amount benchmarks.

Pathways80

The strongest saved finding concerns formation of the collagen framework; cofactor roles do not establish additional bone-density benefit.
Depth
The strongest saved finding concerns formation of the collagen framework; cofactor roles do not establish additional bone-density benefit.
Breadth
The supplied findings cover calcium absorption and regulation, collagen framework formation. These are complementary roles, without demonstrating a combined clinical benefit.

Evidence100

Calcium leads the supplied evidence finding; its practical role is filling intake gaps, with mixed fracture results.
Evidence strength
Calcium leads the supplied evidence finding; its practical role is filling intake gaps, with mixed fracture results.
Studied preparation
The counted ingredients meet the supplied preparation checks; this does not establish extra clinical benefit from their particular forms.

Formulation logic100

The counted ingredients either stand alone in the supplied findings or have their required partner present.
Partner coverage
The counted ingredients either stand alone in the supplied findings or have their required partner present.
Conflicts
No evaluated ingredient conflict was identified in the supplied findings.
Effective doses
All counted ingredients meet the supplied amount-inclusion benchmark; that threshold is not a proven effective clinical dose.
Study evidence
Calcium Supportive 144 studies
Copper Disputed 20 studies
Folate Supportive 50 studies
Magnesium Supportive 48 studies
Manganese Adverse 12 studies
Vitamin A Adverse 56 studies
Vitamin C Supportive 46 studies
Vitamin D Supportive 202 studies
Vitamin K Supportive 78 studies
Zinc Supportive 33 studies
Hair Health
Impact
High effect
C- Ingredient FitD+ PathwaysA+ EvidenceA+ Formulation Logic
Biotin · 30 mcgVitamin D · 25 mcgZinc · 15 mgIron · 18 mgVitamin C · 180 mg

Zinc can help address shedding caused by inadequate zinc intake, and iron can help when iron deficiency is responsible. Biotin has a similarly limited role in deficiency-related shedding; higher amounts do not establish extra regrowth with adequate intake. The remaining nutrient functions do not establish routine hair growth. The saved findings mainly recognize nutrient amounts and antioxidant-related coverage, whose practical benefit remains dependent on the specific nutritional circumstances.

How this product is rated for Hair Health

Ingredient fit60

The formula contains recognized hair-related ingredients, but their practical relevance depends on nutritional need and usable amounts. Recognized hair-related ingredients sit alongside ingredients serving other purposes, so the formula has a broader focus.
Goal fit
Recognized hair-related ingredients sit alongside ingredients serving other purposes, so the formula has a broader focus.
Dose adequacy
Some recognized ingredients have low or unresolved amounts, limiting how much the serving contributes.

Pathways51

Antioxidant-related nutrient coverage is the strongest finding, but normal antioxidant functions do not establish hair regrowth. Meaningful coverage centers on antioxidant-related functions, with limited coverage of the other hair pathways.
Depth
Antioxidant-related nutrient coverage is the strongest finding, but normal antioxidant functions do not establish hair regrowth.
Breadth
Meaningful coverage centers on antioxidant-related functions, with limited coverage of the other hair pathways.

Evidence97

Zinc is the leading recognized ingredient; its practical hair benefit is relevant to deficiency-related shedding, rather than routine regrowth. Preparation matching does not establish a trial of the complete product.
Evidence strength
Zinc is the leading recognized ingredient; its practical hair benefit is relevant to deficiency-related shedding, rather than routine regrowth.
Studied preparation
Recognized preparations meet the saved comparison criteria except iodine; this does not demonstrate hair benefits from the complete formula.

Formulation logic98

The recognized ingredients have no missing required partner or configured conflict. Vitamin B9 (Folate) has low or unresolved amounts in the saved findings; the other recognized ingredients meet its amount criterion.
Partner coverage
No required partner is missing among the recognized ingredients; this does not establish extra benefit from combining them.
Conflicts
No configured ingredient conflict was identified in the supplied findings.
Effective doses
Vitamin B9 (Folate) has low or unresolved amounts in the saved findings; the other recognized ingredients meet its amount criterion.
Study evidence
Biotin Supportive 4 studies
Copper Adverse 4 studies
Folate Mixed 15 studies
Iodine No effect 1 study
Iron Disputed 25 studies
Niacin Disputed 2 studies
Selenium Disputed 7 studies
Vitamin A Disputed 13 studies
Vitamin D Disputed 34 studies
Vitamin E No effect 3 studies
Zinc Supportive 22 studies
Impact
High effect
D+ Ingredient FitD- PathwaysA+ EvidenceA+ Formulation Logic
Folate · 1000 mcg DFEVitamin B12 · 6 mcgVitamin B6 · 2 mgMolybdenum · 75 mcgSelenium · 70 mcgMagnesium · 100 mgVitamin E · 22.5 mgZinc · 15 mgVitamin C · 180 mgRiboflavin · 1.7 mg

Folate supports normal methyl-group metabolism; its arsenic-related findings concern chronically exposed adults and cannot be generalized to routine toxin removal. Selenium has limited mercury-related findings in small studies of low-selenium or exposed populations, rather than broad detoxification evidence.

How this product is rated for Liver & Detox

Ingredient fit52

Folate contributes a context-specific connection to this goal; the wider nutrient formula is less focused on toxin removal.
Goal fit
Other actives and links to additional goals make the formulation less specific to this goal.
Dose adequacy
Several declared amounts receive partial recognition; lower or unknown amounts limit contributions without proving ineffectiveness.

Pathways42

The strongest retained coverage concerns detox-enzyme induction. These ingredient-role categories do not establish measured toxin clearance.
Depth
The strongest retained ingredient-role coverage concerns detox-enzyme induction, rather than demonstrated clearance of an identified toxin.
Breadth
Only one tracked role reaches the coverage threshold.

Evidence99

Vitamin B9 (Folate) provides the strongest retained contribution, while population and preparation limits constrain the benefits that can be described.
Evidence strength
Vitamin B9 (Folate) supplies the strongest retained evidence contribution; this does not establish generalized toxin removal.
Studied preparation
Some retained contributions lack recognized studied preparations, limiting correspondence with the supplied research.

Formulation logic100

No required partner is missing and no configured conflict was identified. Retained ingredients meet the minimum comparison threshold.
Partner coverage
No required partner is missing; this does not establish an extra combination benefit.
Conflicts
No configured conflict was identified from the supplied facts.
Effective doses
All retained ingredients meet the minimum comparison threshold; this is not proof of an effective detoxification regimen.
Study evidence
Folate Supportive 16 studies
Magnesium Supportive 19 studies
Selenium Supportive 10 studies
Vitamin C Supportive 9 studies
Vitamin E Supportive 23 studies
Zinc Supportive 30 studies

Ingredients

IngredientAmount per servingScore
Vitamin A (Beta-Carotene, Retinyl Acetate)
750 mcg
Vitamin C (Ascorbic Acid)
180 mg
Vitamin D3 (Cholecalciferol)
25 mcg
Vitamin E (DL-Alpha-Tocopheryl Acetate)
22.5 mg
Vitamin K (Phytonadione)
80 mcg 42
Thiamine (Thiamine Mononitrate)
1.5 mg
Riboflavin
1.7 mg
Niacin (Niacinamide)
20 mg
Vitamin B6 (Pyridoxine Hydrochloride)
2 mg
Folate
1000 mcg DFE
Vitamin B12 (Cyanocobalamin)
6 mcg
Biotin
30 mcg
Pantothenic Acid (D-Calcium Pantothenate)
10 mg
Calcium (Calcium Carbonate)
250 mg 72
Iron (Ferrous Fumarate)
18 mg 73
Iodine (Potassium Iodide)
150 mcg 100
Magnesium (Magnesium Oxide)
100 mg
Zinc (Zinc Oxide)
15 mg
Selenium (Sodium Selenate)
70 mcg 53
Copper (Cupric Sulfate)
2 mg 69
Manganese (Manganese Sulfate)
4 mg 76
Chromium (Chromium Chloride)
120 mcg 32
Molybdenum (Sodium Molybdate)
75 mcg 74
Gluten Free Women 18–50
Report overview
A+ Active Ingredient Quality & BioavailabilityA+ Dose, Safety & Label TransparencyA+ Value
Each serving provides 150 mcg of iodine as potassium iodide. The whole-product serving costs about $0.13.
How this ingredient is rated

Active Ingredient Quality & Bioavailability100

Iodine is supplied as potassium iodide, a form the evaluation considers favorable for absorption.
Iodine Form & Bioavailability
Potassium iodide is the iodine source; the evaluation considers it favorable for absorption.
Marine Source Purity & Sourcing
The recorded source is potassium iodide, for which the marine sourcing check does not apply.

Dose, Safety & Label Transparency100

The recorded iodine amount is 150 mcg per serving and falls within the evaluation’s safety threshold.
Dosage Efficacy for Daily Support
Each serving provides 150 mcg of iodine. The evaluation considers this amount aligned with daily support.
Dosage Safety & Upper Limits
The 150 mcg serving amount is within the evaluation’s safety threshold.
Elemental Iodine Transparency
The iodine amount is recorded directly as 150 mcg per serving.

Value100

The whole-product serving costs about $0.13.
Price Per Effective Serving
The whole-product serving costs about $0.13.
C- Active Ingredient Quality & BioavailabilityA- Dose, Safety & Label TransparencyB+ Value
Each serving provides 75 mcg of molybdenum from sodium molybdate, a soluble form. The whole-product serving costs about $0.13.
How this ingredient is rated

Active Ingredient Quality & Bioavailability56

Sodium molybdate is a soluble form of molybdenum. No branded molybdenum source is recorded in the saved information.
Molybdenum Chemical Form
Sodium molybdate is a soluble form of molybdenum.
Branded or Patented Source
No branded molybdenum source is recorded in the saved information.

Dose, Safety & Label Transparency88

The 75 mcg per serving falls within the evaluated range, below its preferred amount. No excess is flagged for the serving.
Elemental Dose Optimization
The 75 mcg per serving falls within the evaluated range, below its preferred amount.
Upper Limit (UL) Safety Compliance
The serving is below the upper intake limit used in the evaluation; intake from food and other supplements is not included.

Value80

At about $0.13 per whole-product serving, it is a relatively low price in this comparison.
Price per Effective Serving
At about $0.13 per whole-product serving, it is a relatively low price in this comparison.
C+ Active Ingredient Quality & BioavailabilityC+ Dose, Safety & Label TransparencyA+ Value
Each tablet provides 250 mg of calcium as calcium carbonate. A whole-product serving costs about $0.13.
How this ingredient is rated

Active Ingredient Quality & Bioavailability65

The calcium source is calcium carbonate. The calcium amount is stated as 250 mg per serving.
Calcium Form & Absorption Potential
The calcium source is calcium carbonate.
Elemental Calcium Transparency
The calcium amount is stated as 250 mg per serving.

Dose, Safety & Label Transparency66

The serving provides 250 mg of calcium. A flow agent is recorded among the other ingredients.
Absorption-Optimized Serving Dose
The serving provides 250 mg of calcium.
Formulation Purity & Additives
A flow agent is recorded among the other ingredients.

Value100

The whole-product serving costs about $0.13.
Price Per Serving Efficiency
The whole-product serving costs about $0.13.
Report alternatives

Sources

Published studies used for the product analysis and the top-ranked studies for each ingredient and goal.

  1. What is the impact of daily oral supplementation of vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) plus calcium on the incidence of hip fracture in older people? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Manoj P; Derwin R; George S · International journal of older people nursing · 2023
    Meta-analysis12,620 participants7 studies pooledBone Health forCalcium
  2. Calcium supplementation prevents seasonal bone loss and changes in biochemical markers of bone turnover in elderly New England women: a randomized placebo-controlled trial.
    Storm D; Eslin R; Porter ES; Musgrave K; Vereault D; Patton C; Kessenich C; Mohan S; Chen T; Holick MF; Rosen CJ · The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 1998
    Randomized trial60 participantsBone Health forCalcium
  3. The effects of calcium supplementation (milk powder or tablets) and exercise on bone density in postmenopausal women.
    Prince R; Devine A; Dick I; Criddle A; Kerr D; Kent N; Price R; Randell A · Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 1995
    Randomized trial168 participantsBone Health forCalcium
  4. The efficacy of calcium supplementation alone in elderly Thai women over a 2-year period: a randomized controlled trial.
    Rajatanavin R; Chailurkit L; Saetung S; Thakkinstian A; Nimitphong H · Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2014
    Randomized trial404 participantsBone Health forCalcium
  5. Calcium-enriched foods and bone mass growth in prepubertal girls: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
    Bonjour JP; Carrie AL; Ferrari S; Clavien H; Slosman D; Theintz G; Rizzoli R · The Journal of clinical investigation · 1997
    Randomized trial149 participantsBone Health forCalcium
  6. The Association between Dietary and Circulating Copper Levels and Osteoporosis: a Scoping Review.
    Ju Y; Xiong W; Pang Y; Chen Z; Hou J; Zheng S; Li Z; Liu T; Xia H; Xia M; Zhong Y; Li J; Jiang X · Biological trace element research · 2026
    Scoping review18 studies pooledBone Health forCopper
  7. Association between dietary copper, iron, zinc, selenium intake and osteopenia or osteoporosis in elderly hypertensive patients: a retrospective cohort study.
    Chen M; Jia L; Gao R · Frontiers in nutrition · 2024
    Cohort study5,286 participantsBone Health forCopper
  8. Associations of dietary copper intake with total bone mineral density and lumbar spine bone mineral density in American adults.
    Hu M; Wang Z; Li C; Zheng Y; Hu J · Medicine · 2025
    Cross-sectional studyBone Health forCopper
  9. The association between dietary mineral intake and bone mineral density: a cross-sectional study.
    Wei M; Wei J; Huang S · Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2025
    Cross-sectional study11,520 participantsBone Health forCopper
  10. Association between dietary copper intake and bone mineral density in children and adolescents aged 8-19 years: A cross-sectional study.
    Cui A; Yan J; Li H; Fan Z; Wei X; Wang H; Zhuang Y · PloS one · 2024
    Cross-sectional study6,965 participantsBone Health forCopper
  11. Association between RBC folate and lumbar bone mineral density in postmenopausal women, a cross-sectional study from NHANES 2009-2018.
    Wei H; Jin Z; Zhou L; Tang G; Chai S; Che X; Tan Y; Zeng W · Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025
    Cross-sectional study1,315 participantsBone Health forFolate
  12. Genetic variants modify the associations of concentrations of methylmalonic acid, vitamin B-12, vitamin B-6, and folate with bone mineral density.
    Liu CT; Karasik D; Xu H; Zhou Y; Broe K; Cupples LA; Cpgm de Groot L; Ham A; Hannan MT; Hsu YH; Jacques P; McLean RR; Paul L; Selhub J; Trajanoska K; van der Velde N; van Schoor N; Kiel DP · The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2021
    Cohort study4,310 participantsBone Health forFolate
  13. Adequate Intake and Supplementation of B Vitamins, in Particular Folic Acid, can Play a Protective Role in Bone Health.
    Rondanelli M; Tartara A; Fossari F; Vecchio V; Faliva MA; Naso M; Perna S; Nichetti M; Peroni G · Current aging science · 2022
    Narrative review35,298 participants29 studies pooledBone Health forFolate Bone Health forVitamin B6
  14. Relation of homocysteine, folate, and vitamin B12 to bone mineral density of postmenopausal women.
    Cagnacci A; Baldassari F; Rivolta G; Arangino S; Volpe A · Bone · 2004
    Cross-sectional study161 participantsBone Health forFolate
  15. Dietary intake of folate, but not vitamin B2 or B12, is associated with increased bone mineral density 5 years after the menopause: results from a 10-year follow-up study in early postmenopausal women.
    Rejnmark L; Vestergaard P; Hermann AP; Brot C; Eiken P; Mosekilde L · Calcified tissue international · 2008
    Cohort study1,869 participantsBone Health forFolate
  16. Association between Serum Magnesium and Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.
    Dominguez LJ; Veronese N; Ciriminna S; Pérez-Albela JL; Vásquez-López VF; Rodas-Regalado S; Di Bella G; Parisi A; Tagliaferri F; Barbagallo M · Nutrients · 2023
    Meta-analysis119,755 participants4 studies pooledBone Health forMagnesium
  17. Bioabsorbable Magnesium-Based Materials Potential and Safety in Bone Surgery: A Systematic Review.
    Hung CH; Kwok YC; Yip J; Wong HH; Leung YY · Craniomaxillofacial trauma & reconstruction · 2025
    Systematic review386 participants8 studies pooledBone Health forMagnesium
  18. Vascularized bone grafting fixed by biodegradable magnesium screw for treating osteonecrosis of the femoral head.
    Zhao D; Huang S; Lu F; Wang B; Yang L; Qin L; Yang K; Li Y; Li W; Wang W; Tian S; Zhang X; Gao W; Wang Z; Zhang Y; Xie X; Wang J; Li J · Biomaterials · 2016
    Randomized trial48 participantsBone Health forMagnesium
  19. An update on magnesium and bone health.
    Rondanelli M; Faliva MA; Tartara A; Gasparri C; Perna S; Infantino V; Riva A; Petrangolini G; Peroni G · Biometals : an international journal on the role of metal ions in biology, biochemistry, and medicine · 2022
    Narrative reviewBone Health forMagnesium
  20. Sex-specific differences in the association of magnesium intake with femoral neck bone mineral density among older adults.
    Wang B; Tan X; Yao X; Zhu Z · Endocrine connections · 2025
    Cross-sectional study1,343 participantsBone Health forMagnesium